 |
Re: Bill Sets Fine for Low-Riding Pants |
 |
02-09-2005, 01:28 PM
|
#1
|
The Nullified One
Null is offline
Location: Hockeytown, MI
Now Playing: Counter-Strike: Source
Posts: 4,966
|
Re: Bill Sets Fine for Low-Riding Pants
hmmmm. Would the girls with the thong showing be a lewd or indecent manner?
__________________
DS Friends Code:
300 721 299 757
Wii Friends Code:
4481 4992 4915 9887
|
|
|
 |
Re: Bill Sets Fine for Low-Riding Pants |
 |
02-09-2005, 01:30 PM
|
#2
|
Unsung
Stray_Bullet is offline
Now Playing: Somewhere Else
Posts: 376
|
Re: Bill Sets Fine for Low-Riding Pants
Quote:
Originally Posted by Null
hmmmm. Would the girls with the thong showing be a lewd or indecent manner?
|
Depends on the girl. Depends on the thong.
__________________

As I climb onto your back, I will promise not to sting.
I will tell you what you want to hear and not mean anything.
As I treat you like a dog, and I shoot my venom in,
You pretend you never knew that I am a scorpion.
12 AM EDT Weds May 25, 2005
|
|
|
 |
Re: Bill Sets Fine for Low-Riding Pants |
 |
02-09-2005, 01:49 PM
|
#3
|
Or should I say.. smanger
Dyne is offline
Location: Vancouver
Now Playing: Infinity Blade II, Duke Nukem Forever, Skyrim, Vanquish
Posts: 9,435
|
Re: Bill Sets Fine for Low-Riding Pants
Good on them. You don't really see that around up here, mainly because it's a bit more chilly than in Virginia. A lot of people just wear long sweaters to cover it up.
Speaking of which, I hope they don't pass a bill for having pants ride up too high on girls.. 
|
|
|
 |
Re: Bill Sets Fine for Low-Riding Pants |
 |
02-09-2005, 02:23 PM
|
#4
|
Language Goddess
DimHalo is offline
Location: St. Louis, MO
Now Playing: Nights on the Wii
Posts: 2,561
|
Re: Bill Sets Fine for Low-Riding Pants
Although I don't like to see that kind of stuff, it is often repulsive, I am not sure that it is really a matter that should be taken by legal matters.
__________________
Can't help it, the girl can't help it.
www.myspace.com/alexismmm
It's another night in hell, Another child won't live to tell
Can you imagine what it's like to starve to death
And as we sit free and well, Another soldier has to yell
Tell my wife and children I love them in his last breath
C'mon now amen, amen, amen
|
|
|
 |
Re: Bill Sets Fine for Low-Riding Pants |
 |
02-09-2005, 02:45 PM
|
#5
|
The Nullified One
Null is offline
Location: Hockeytown, MI
Now Playing: Counter-Strike: Source
Posts: 4,966
|
Re: Bill Sets Fine for Low-Riding Pants
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stray_Bullet
Depends on the girl. Depends on the thong.
|
good answer... good answer.
__________________
DS Friends Code:
300 721 299 757
Wii Friends Code:
4481 4992 4915 9887
|
|
|
 |
Re: Bill Sets Fine for Low-Riding Pants |
 |
02-09-2005, 04:20 PM
|
#6
|
No Pants
KillerGremlin is offline
Location: Friggin In The Riggin
Now Playing: my ding-a-ling
Posts: 4,566
|
Re: Bill Sets Fine for Low-Riding Pants
Sh*t.....we had this going in middle school. The teachers would go up to us guys, and say "pull your pants up, we can see your boxers," but they never went up to the girls and went "pull your pants up, we can see your thong."
NOT that I'm complaining.
I think the law is stupid. I'm not offended by seeing some guy's boxers, and I know every guy makes it a sport to thongview.
|
|
|
 |
Re: Bill Sets Fine for Low-Riding Pants |
 |
02-09-2005, 04:58 PM
|
#7
|
Otis the Drunk
Blackmane is offline
Location: In a magical far away place, where the towels are OH SO FLUFFY!
Now Playing: LittleBigPlanet
Posts: 1,500
|
Re: Bill Sets Fine for Low-Riding Pants
It is ok with me to have this law, because I am not a Virginian.
Do I agree with the law? Well, I think that there is a point where I think pants are ridiculously low, and when its not so bad. If they are talking about putting a stop to having pants almost to the bottom of your boxers, then I am for that. I don't care for people telling me to pull up my pants because the top strap is visible or something like that.
__________________
"Nothing good ever comes from being with normal people."
AIM:Blackmane316
Email Me
|
|
|
 |
Re: Bill Sets Fine for Low-Riding Pants |
 |
02-09-2005, 09:19 PM
|
#8
|
Knight
Yan is offline
Location: Down Under
Now Playing:
Posts: 388
|
Re: Bill Sets Fine for Low-Riding Pants
With hipsters pants being all the rage now, it's kind of difficult to keep things that should be out of sight, out of sight.
I personally think that it is distasteful although I understand if it is not intentionally done. I have had episodes where I myself encountered some err... waredrobe malfunction. Then again, I have seen people who does it delibrately. They'd hike up their thongs till their waist but their pants are so low you could tell what brand their underwear was. Not a good look...
I have also seen girls in jeans that shows ~10cm of crack when they are sitting down.
This is an example where it all went wrong.
http://editorial.gettyimages.com/sou...d=935061&cdi=0
__________________
post count +1
|
|
|
 |
Re: Bill Sets Fine for Low-Riding Pants |
 |
02-09-2005, 10:38 PM
|
#9
|
No Pants
KillerGremlin is offline
Location: Friggin In The Riggin
Now Playing: my ding-a-ling
Posts: 4,566
|
Re: Bill Sets Fine for Low-Riding Pants
Meh.....it's a backless dress. There are times when adults should be allowed to be adults. I mean, I could see someone having an angst against that in public, but if it was at a dance or something, then I think that could work.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:55 AM. |
|
|
|
|