Go Back   GameTavern > House Specials > Video Gaming
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: king ati
Old 09-26-2003, 04:35 PM   #26
Jonbo298
Freaky me Freaky you
 
Jonbo298's Avatar
 
Jonbo298 is offline
Location: In the Cornfields of Iowa
Now Playing:
Posts: 8,082
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: king ati

Quote:
Originally Posted by bouncer_agb
That's what AMD's original marketing plan was. And at first the AMD chips that were compared to certain P4 chips by the 2200+ etc were actually comparable. Sometimes faster sometimes not. But since the 2800+ AMD has dropped off. It's a fact. The Barton core can't handle the speed anymore. What AMD has done for the last couple barton chips released is overclock them a tiny bit more and slop a new name on. It's not right. The 3200+ isn't anywhere near to comparable to the P4 3.2 from a techie point of view. The latest P4's have been stomping the latest AMD's.
The Barton's have 512K of cache which from what I have seen first hand, helps alot. That's why my next processor purchase is the 2500+ because it has 512K of cache. Then I can just overclock it to 2600 or higher and I've saved money instead of getting a 2800+.

And I won't be getting a Pentium anytime soon. They are too expensive for me. As long as I can play a game at a good rate, I'm happy.
__________________

Credit to Null for sig

  Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:07 AM.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GameTavern