|
Originally Posted by gekko
Moving on to Ranzid
Actually, it would be better if you could do it without links. The reality is you're more or less unaware of the situation in other countries, in the same way you're unaware of the situation in the middle east. I'm just pointing out the fact that you can't hide the obvious here, and if you want to bring up a point, at least know something on it.
Actually, not really. Our economy would've been better off not spending all that money in the first place.
Actions speak louder than words. Last time I checked, you haven't learned a thing in months.
Except this isn't normal business. And he should be looking out for the interest of his people, and when you're on the brink of war, you should start telling the truth. Thing is, he had them, and he is a master at hiding them. Then we pull out inspectors for months of arguing, giving him a chance to permanently hide this stuff, if not move it. I don't think realistically he could've destroyed everything in that amount of time, but he can hide it, and make it almost impossible to find without human intelligence. Of course, the CIA is having its own problems and we have had horrible human intelligence in Iraq for some time. Now if you think Bush exagerated the threat of WMD, you can make a case for it, but there is no evidence of it at this time. If you think WMD don't exist, you're blind.
A lot of people, like myself, think it's a good enough reason to take out Saddam. While all the Democrats and anti-Bush people are trying to say that the WMD don't exist, a lot of people don't really care if we've found them now, or if we find them later. The world is a better place with Saddam gone, and hopefully Iraq can be used as an example for the rest of these countries. Iraq is nearing a revolt, the house of Saud is on its last days, and hopefully the region doesn't turn to ****, not like it isn't now.
|
Re: Saddam's Sons Confirmed Dead
Threaded Mode
