Quote:
Originally posted by gekko
One is a forest that you travel through at high speeds. Anytime you are speeding through an area, it will have considerably less detail than it would otherwise. And even with that being said, the forest looks great.
The other shot is a rendered screen (read: not what you'll see when playing the game), with a photograph in the background. Ignore the cannon, compare it to the rocks along the side of the track. Those don't look too hot. Also, that is a high-res screen, designed exclusively to make the game look better than it actually is. PS2 can't output at 720p. The game runs in 640x480, which will be considerably less detail.
|
yes, I realize that. my point is, why shouldn't space shooters (not necessarily this space shooter) look as good as racing games (not necessarily GT4), because BAB's comment was that comparing those 2 genres was bad. Although the choice of screens for comparison were bad, I still dont see why one genre should look worse than another merely because of its genre.
Threaded Mode
