My Rant Against EA

[Typhoid]

While I agree that that type of price gouging is pretty weak and ultimately utterly lame, Microsoft (via XBL) does it all the time, and it's no big deal by anyone. Granted, EA bought the rights to the NFL games, however they definitely didn't "start" the price gouging. They just joined in. Take games like Halo (just for example). How many map packs and add-ons go into games like that? While you may sit there and say "But yeah, that changes the game, and adds a new element", I will counter that with "The create-a-play mode also entirely changes the game and adds an element to it."


Marvel Ultimate Alliance had you buying extra characters which should have been in the original game itself, characters who are (as far as I know) in MA2 - yet I wouldn't doubt that they will release more character packs.

Heaven forbid you want new songs for Rock Band or Guitar Hero. You better break out the credit card for that, too.

Let alone paying for online play in itself. You pay for the system, game, add-ons, internet connection and the ability to play via XBL.



Now, I'm not saying that what EA did was super fantastic and not gouging, but they didn't start the trend. They just realized people will pay.

[Professor S]

Originally Posted by Typhoid

While I agree that that type of price gouging is pretty weak and ultimately utterly lame, Microsoft (via XBL) does it all the time, and it's no big deal by anyone. Granted, EA bought the rights to the NFL games, however they definitely didn't "start" the price gouging. They just joined in. Take games like Halo (just for example). How many map packs and add-ons go into games like that? While you may sit there and say "But yeah, that changes the game, and adds a new element", I will counter that with "The create-a-play mode also entirely changes the game and adds an element to it." .

I agree in most cases, and overall I like the option of paying for additional content for games I love, but in the case you used as an example that is content that was included in previous games and has been removed to be sold for additional profit at a later date. To me, that's the equivalent of Fable 2 being released, but without any weapons... they're an extra $10.

Also, I think timing is a big thing. If EA just held onto the content for a little while, their gauging wouldn't be quite so... brazen I guess. I suppose part of my issue is with the sheer hubris EA displays.

[Typhoid]

I agree in most cases

Can I get that in writing?

I agree in most cases, and overall I like the option of paying for additional content for games I love, but in the case you used as an example that is content that was included in previous games and has been removed to be sold for additional profit at a later date.

As far as I know for Rock Band, in order to get your Rock Band 1 songs on Rock Band 2, you needed to pay. Then again I don't have either of those games, so I'm not entirely sure.


I mean, I see what the big kafuffle is about. Something that was in a game previously was removed and sold as an add-on. There could be reasons for that. Most likely the chance of getting extra money. Or possibly they didn't finish it in time for launch, so they released them extra. But then again, it's most likely the chance of getting extra money.

The reason I don't see it as a big deal is because I never create plays for any game, be it hockey or football. I wouldn't have even noticed the option wasn't there. But if you ever remove my fantasy draft option, there will be hell to pay.

[Vampyr]

Originally Posted by Typhoid

As far as I know for Rock Band, in order to get your Rock Band 1 songs on Rock Band 2, you needed to pay. Then again I don't have either of those games, so I'm not entirely sure.

True, but it was cheap and there was at least a more logical reason behind that - they couldn't offer all of those songs on a new game without paying the right holders for it.

[TheGame]

Originally Posted by Typhoid

Let alone paying for online play in itself. You pay for the system, game, add-ons, internet connection and the ability to play via XBL.

Now, I'm not saying that what EA did was super fantastic and not gouging, but they didn't start the trend. They just realized people will pay.

Yeah, I don't think its nessicarily EA's fault for starting it. It just that a lot of EA games suck so they're easy to pick on (plus they have the best selling PC game of all time and its ridled with add ons), but I agree completly with you. That's one of the things that turns me off about Xbox 360 in general too. (Yeah I know now I'll make some enemies~)

But on Ps3 out of the box you're getting a good wireless controler, 120 Gig HD, full internet features, a wireless router, and a Blu ray player (which for the sake of comparision, lets call it a "HD Movie player").. All of which I utilize. And all of which come in the $299 package.

If I bought a 360 with all of those features, I'd be spending over $500 to get it rolling, then another $50 per year.. Not that I think its horrible to buy a watered down package to make it cheaper, but when Ps4 ends up being worse then Ps3 out of the box to make it cheaper.. we can't really blame Sony.

[BreakABone]

Originally Posted by Typhoid

While I agree that that type of price gouging is pretty weak and ultimately utterly lame, Microsoft (via XBL) does it all the time, and it's no big deal by anyone. Granted, EA bought the rights to the NFL games, however they definitely didn't "start" the price gouging. They just joined in. Take games like Halo (just for example). How many map packs and add-ons go into games like that? While you may sit there and say "But yeah, that changes the game, and adds a new element", I will counter that with "The create-a-play mode also entirely changes the game and adds an element to it."

Glad someone bought up Halo, which IMO goes a step further into DLC bullying.
As it currently stands, I believe you can only play 2 online modes if you do not have 3 of the 4 DLC map packs released with friends, and maybe 3 by yourself.

Forcing you to buy some combination of the 3 to get access to the majority of modes.

Originally Posted by TheGame

But on Ps3 out of the box you're getting a good wireless controler, 120 Gig HD, full internet features, a wireless router, and a Blu ray player (which for the sake of comparision, lets call it a "HD Movie player").. All of which I utilize. And all of which come in the $299 package.

If I bought a 360 with all of those features, I'd be spending over $500 to get it rolling, then another $50 per year.. Not that I think its horrible to buy a watered down package to make it cheaper, but when Ps4 ends up being worse then Ps3 out of the box to make it cheaper.. we can't really blame Sony.

Well, you are looking at it in the current spectrum, but you got to realize in order to get all those features, the Ps3 had to come out 200-300 dollars ahead of the Xbox.. a year after the Xbox released.

So now it looks like a fine package, but up until the start of this month, it would have pretty much even out.

[TheGame]

Originally Posted by BreakABone

Well, you are looking at it in the current spectrum, but you got to realize in order to get all those features, the Ps3 had to come out 200-300 dollars ahead of the Xbox.. a year after the Xbox released.

So now it looks like a fine package, but up until the start of this month, it would have pretty much even out.

True, though I think the HD DVD player was $150 around Ps3's launch, the wireless router was still $100, and Xbox live was still $50. Though I don't know the price of the base unit that came with a hard drive back then.

[BreakABone]

Originally Posted by TheGame

True, though I think the HD DVD player was $150 around Ps3's launch, the wireless router was still $100, and Xbox live was still $50. Though I don't know the price of the base unit that came with a hard drive back then.

Well we could also add 40-50 for a mic for the PS3 as it still doesn't come with one, and 50 bucks for the DualShock 3 controller, which I assume is the ones that comes with the PS3 now and not the SixAxis?

But we are getting off the talking point... though think one of the few times, the forum pretty much agrees down the line...

[TheGame]

Originally Posted by BreakABone

Well we could also add 40-50 for a mic for the PS3 as it still doesn't come with one, and 50 bucks for the DualShock 3 controller, which I assume is the ones that comes with the PS3 now and not the SixAxis?

But we are getting off the talking point... though think one of the few times, the forum pretty much agrees down the line...

Yup, comes with DS3 now. And neither system comes with a mic.

But, setting all that aside, my point was more that, the gaming industry is going to (if it already hasn't) move towards selling watered down products and charging extra fees for little things that could have been included in the package int he first place.

MMORPGs might be the trail blazer for this one, now that I think about it. The mix of having monthly fees and tossing on expansions.. and charging for things like server changes, and character recustomizations.. And making the begining product so watered down that it needs countless updates just to make it feel like a solid game..

[BreakABone]

Originally Posted by TheGame

Yup, comes with DS3 now. And neither system comes with a mic.

The Xbox comes with a mic unless that has changed recently?

[Thespis721]

Originally Posted by Typhoid

While I agree that that type of price gouging is pretty weak and ultimately utterly lame, Microsoft (via XBL) does it all the time, and it's no big deal by anyone. Granted, EA bought the rights to the NFL games, however they definitely didn't "start" the price gouging. They just joined in. Take games like Halo (just for example). How many map packs and add-ons go into games like that? While you may sit there and say "But yeah, that changes the game, and adds a new element", I will counter that with "The create-a-play mode also entirely changes the game and adds an element to it."


Marvel Ultimate Alliance had you buying extra characters which should have been in the original game itself, characters who are (as far as I know) in MA2 - yet I wouldn't doubt that they will release more character packs.

Heaven forbid you want new songs for Rock Band or Guitar Hero. You better break out the credit card for that, too.

I agree about that EA didn't start it. The nickle and diming started well before! However like Professor S said, EA took a feature that was previously in the game and turned it into additional paid content, which is different then a map pack. A lot of times you see "classic maps" unlockable in a game (and unless there is a new engine for the game, you should never have to pay for classic maps).

In MUA, the issue was that the characters were already IN the game and EA was just unlocking them for you. If a month later, they added additional characters to the game, that'd be different. In fact, I wouldn't mind them introducing new characters all the time assuming it's a good price point.

And those RB/GH songs also weren't in the game originally and are priced quite well.

I think there are some good examples of nickle and diming (Fable 2, RB/GH, SOME map packs) but usually the stuff is either ridiculous that you have to buy it or is WAY overpriced.