Space Madness Round 1 - Strange Transmission

[Vampyr]

Originally Posted by Typhoid

I've had enough of you and your manipulating ways.
You have stated in every game such as this, that you attempt to manipulate everyone right away.

And you said everyone who isn't crazy, all vote for the same person.
We are.
We are voting for uber paddler, apparently.
So you and your flock of crazies, can go and vote for Swan.

I too, was voting for Uber paddler when there was a minority group voting for him, and the majority seemed to be going with Germanator, and people were giving odd reasons for voting for him, reasons that did not make sense, and were more of a ploy to cover up their true actions.

But once votes started to build on Uber, everyone switched to him, meaning that the crazies don't mind if he dies either.

This isn't manipulation, yet at least, it's just simple logic. Anyone here can sit back and read through the thread and see that what I propose makes sense.

And your attempt to start a witch hunt leads me to believe you too are crazy, and possibly trying to protect Swan, if he is crazy (which he was acting like).

If everyone suddenly switches to Swan, we'll know he's innocent, or that the crazies are just voting for one of their own, and will switch their votes in the last few minutes. Doing the latter, however, will definitely show who is truely crazy.

[Typhoid]

Originally Posted by Vampyr

If everyone suddenly switches to Swan, we'll know he's innocent, or that the crazies are just voting for one of their own, and will switch their votes in the last few minutes. Doing the latter, however, will definitely show who is truely crazy.

No, if everyone suddenly switches to Swan, we'll know that you now can assume you have control of people's minds, and their vote of confidence that you are not a crazy.

My votes are not going on peoples posts. At all. Not now, anyways.
They are going by the flow of the actual story dialogue itself.
As this is the first round, I am joining the majority, as most others are doing, as to not draw attention to themselves, considering this madness just started occuring, and everyone is dazed, and in a blind rage of what to do.

[Vampyr]

Originally Posted by Typhoid

No, if everyone suddenly switches to Swan, we'll know that you now can assume you have control of people's minds, and their vote of confidence that you are not a crazy.

My votes are not going on peoples posts. At all. Not now, anyways.
They are going by the flow of the actual story dialogue itself.
As this is the first round, I am joining the majority, as most others are doing, as to not draw attention to themselves, considering this madness just started occuring, and everyone is dazed, and in a blind rage of what to do.

I don't mean to sound out of character, but the story is only for entertainment, isn't it? It doesn't actually reveal anything about the game, does it? It never has before.

[Typhoid]

Originally Posted by Vampyr

I don't mean to sound out of character, but the story is only for entertainment, isn't it? It doesn't actually reveal anything about the game, does it? It never has before.

I'd like to assume it does, considering it has our actual names in it, and you can subtly draw conclusions from it, in partner with posts from the people, as to unusual behaviour of a normal person who is covering something up (IE posts), or the in-story actions.

But that would be a clarification moment.
And I'm far too lazy to move the mouse up to select the orange hue.

[Dylflon]

Originally Posted by Vampyr

I don't mean to sound out of character, but the story is only for entertainment, isn't it? It doesn't actually reveal anything about the game, does it? It never has before.

He speaks the truth. The narration is only for flavor. It will not determine who is crazy. I have to make everyone seem possibly crazy in the narrative to keep it fair.

[manasecret]

Originally Posted by Dylflon

He speaks the truth. The narration is only for flavor. It will not determine who is crazy. I have to make everyone seem possibly crazy in the narrative to keep it fair.

If that's the case, then my reasoning means nothing.

But, unless Sir Uber Paddler decides to participate sometime before Thursday noon, I will keep my vote as him.

[jeepnut]

Originally Posted by manasecret

If that's the case, then my reasoning means nothing.

But, unless Sir Uber Paddler decides to participate sometime before Thursday noon, I will keep my vote as him.

As will I. I would rather vote someone off in the first round who isn't participating than someone who is, crazy or not.

And Vampyr, I'm perfectly willing to switch my vote to anyone if you can provide a logical reason for doing so. However, since it's so early in the game, I doubt you can. For now, I will stick with my "least harm" vote.

[Vampyr]

Originally Posted by jeepnut

As will I. I would rather vote someone off in the first round who isn't participating than someone who is, crazy or not.

And Vampyr, I'm perfectly willing to switch my vote to anyone if you can provide a logical reason for doing so. However, since it's so early in the game, I doubt you can. For now, I will stick with my "least harm" vote.

I'm not providing logical reasons for voting for someone, I'm providing logical reasons not to vote for someone. They could be completely wrong, but Dylflon said we had to pay attention and be careful. At the moment this is the only thing I have to go on, and it makes the most sense to me. In this game, especially at the beginning, going with the bandwagon usually results in the "bad" guys winning.