I played 360

Ginkasa · 05-29-2006, 09:26 PM

I know I want to spend several hundred to a thousand dollars on a new TV (and maybe new cables?) in addition to the money for my XBox360 and a game just so I can fully appreciate the graphical difference.

/me shrugs and walks away

Dylflon · 05-29-2006, 09:29 PM

I almost drooled the first time I saw Fight Night 3.

*happy sigh*

Typhoid · 05-30-2006, 02:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dylflon

I almost drooled the first time I saw Fight Night 3.

*happy sigh*

I remember when I was at Phil's and he just started playing Fight Night 3, and I asked when the fight was starting, and he said "10 seconds ago..." I just sat back in awe.

Canyarion · 05-30-2006, 06:03 AM

I played demos of Need for Speed (I don't keep up with all the names lately) and Quake 4.
And the guy had a very nice TV. It just didn't feel new enough to be next gen. The leaps are getting smaller and smaller with every gen.

Null · 05-30-2006, 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Canyarion

I played demos of Need for Speed (I don't keep up with all the names lately) and Quake 4.
And the guy had a very nice TV. It just didn't feel new enough to be next gen. The leaps are getting smaller and smaller with every gen.

the 'leaps' arent really getting smaller, they're just being used in more areas.

the addition of real textures from PS1/N64 to PS2/GC seemed like a lot more becuause of how bad the ps1/n64 looked. the leap is still there, and can be seen if you know what to look for. but good graphics to great graphics doesnt seem like as big of a thing as bad graphics to good graphics.

Canyarion · 05-30-2006, 10:55 AM

I don't care about the technology behind it or whatever, I care about looks.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Null

but good graphics to great graphics doesnt seem like as big of a thing as bad graphics to good graphics

Null · 05-30-2006, 01:55 PM

well because you personally cant tell a difference doesnt mean the leap isnt there.

i didnt mean just the technology behind it has changed without producing any drastic results...
many people look for more realistic looking charcaters or worlds. and while it can be noticed on that, especially with a HDTV, the difference is just everywhere, Bigger worlds, more detailed worlds, phisics, many many more things on screen at once, with much better AI and better lighting effects. i can tell a differerence right away, especially in gameplay videos.
But many dont know what to look for and dont think about all the power thoes things take and add to the games look.

maybe its the same as people who say they cant hear a difference between normal quality and high quality Audio. i dunno, but i think its quite obvious to me at least the leap is there, and in many cases a bigger leap then before.

Dyne · 05-29-2006, 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Link1130

I know I want to spend several hundred to a thousand dollars on a new TV (and maybe new cables?) in addition to the money for my XBox360 and a game just so I can fully appreciate the graphical difference.

* Link1130 shrugs and walks away

Well, DOA4 looked relatively the same (because the models look like plastic), but everything else has looked fantastic. I even download my demos upstairs and play them for the first time on my room's 13" TV.

Perfect Stu · 05-30-2006, 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Link1130

I know I want to spend several hundred to a thousand dollars on a new TV (and maybe new cables?) in addition to the money for my XBox360 and a game just so I can fully appreciate the graphical difference.

* Link1130 shrugs and walks away

yep...because that's only what you're going to get out of a nice new HDTV. not a sports or movies fan, are ya?

and if you care so much about looks, Cany, why are you looking forward to the Wiiiiii more than any other next gen system?

Canyarion · 05-30-2006, 05:12 PM

I care about looks on Xbox360 and PS3 because IMO it's the best thing they offer. They NEED their looks, Wii doesn't.

Null · 05-30-2006, 05:51 PM

annddd i think we figured out why he 'doesnt notice a difference'

Typhoid · 05-30-2006, 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Canyarion

I care about looks on Xbox360 and PS3 because IMO it's the best thing they offer. They NEED their looks, Wii doesn't.

Why doesnt the Wii need looks?

Because it's 200 dollars for a graphics card, and controller port, more or less?

*coughfanboycough*

Perfect Stu · 05-30-2006, 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Typhoid

*coughfanboycough*

i cant quite make that out, let me get you a coughdrop, see if that helps

:hands Typh a coughdrop:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Typhoid

*fanboy*

Typhoid · 05-30-2006, 07:09 PM

Sadly, I laughed so hard at that.

KillerGremlin · 05-30-2006, 11:14 PM

Jee wiz forum, I wonder where 3rd party support will be for the Wii in 2 years when the system is getting its ass kicked in the graphics department. You better hope that Wii-pointer holds the 3rd party support, or you'll all be left with franchise titles.

Which probably won't bother the Nintendo fanboys.

The PS3 and 360 can put a whole hell of a lot of objects on screen at once...better textures, faster load times, more expansive environments. The list goes on!