Blu-ray wins over HD-DVD

[Jonbo298]

I still like Blu-Ray over HD-DVD because of size difference. 2 hours or so of HD programming vs many many more hours of HD programming/video on a single disc. I think I want more. We've seen how many DVD's companies shove out because of size limitations. Lets not make the same mistake twice.

Granted, Blu-Ray will use many depending, but not as much as current DVD's are today

[gekko]

But HD-DVD now has 3-layered capability, giving it only 5GB less than Blu-Ray, but by having the multiple discs (single, dual, triple layered) it saves on costs if you don't need it so big.

And HD-DVD can do triple-layered HD-DVD on one side, and dual-layered DVD on the other, creating hybrid discs to bridge the gap during the transition period.

Also, HD-DVD can be made on current production facilities.

But Blu-Ray has more support for it, and why not find a way to triple-layer the current Blu-Ray disc, getting 75GB out of it?

The debate goes on...