Excerpts from GTA:San Andreas review from OPM

[Null]

Originally Posted by DarkMaster

to Rockstar...what you don't believe me? They said the same thing to me when I said a PC and Xbox version would be available in the future in my preview "Please remove the part of your preview where you state that a PC and Xbox version will be available in the future. We have no current plans to bring Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas to either of these consoles.

Thank you."

well come on, honestly, you'd think the same way. its hard to believe a kid on a message board when gaming sites are all sayings its confirmed. some say rockstar has made mention of it. others say it differently, like this from IGN...

September 09, 2004 - Buried (somewhat) in Rockstar parent company Take-Two Interactive's third quarter 2004 financial results is mention that the PC version of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas is indeed planned, and expected to be released in the third quarter of 2005.

ah well tho. whether they told you or not is a minor detail because it is indeed going to come out on PC. no one knows of xbox tho.

[DarkMaster]

I'm just telling you what I was told. I know I was specifically asked to take PC and Xbox out of my preview, so it didn't surprise me when someone I worked with told me that Rockstar said "no current plans." The sole reason I put PC and Xbox in my preview was because I saw those articles on IGN and Gamespot, so why Rockstar asked me to take it down is beyond me.

[Null]

well the question that would keep poping up is why would rockstar pay attention to and tell the odd sites to take it down and let the big name sites, that everyone looks at, keep the info up?


really tho, pointless argument. really no way to solve it. so anywho, we'll just move on.

[DarkMaster]

whoa man, just played a few hours. damn good stuff.

[GT News]

Originally Posted by DarkMaster

whoa man, just played a few hours. damn good stuff.

That seems like enough time.Colloquial expression. Thanks for the compliment. Be less specific :-)

[Dyne]

Originally Posted by CamFuBot

Be less specific :-)

Less specific anaphoric relation:

TUcurrent includes TUprevious, and TUcurrent is less specific than TUprevious. Let F be the most specific field in TUcurrent. The resolvent contains all of the information in TUprevious of the same or lower specificity than F.

For example (see also (5)-(6) of the corpus example in Figure 1):

PHP Code:

//Utterance                     //Interpretation
How about Monday at 2?          Assume: 2pm, Monday 19 August
Ok, well, Monday sounds good.     Monday 19 August 


[Swan]

Oh my god.
*rereads everything said about the game*


*orgasms self to death*