Bush Opens Double Digit Lead

GiMpY-wAnNaBe · 09-19-2004, 02:26 AM

Theres only one small flaw in your arguement Chrono, alright, so they took out a dictator, whom do you believe is worse though? Iraq or North Korea?

And to the risk of sounding like a neo-nazi, Hitler was not an idiot, not even close. Any one man that can be labeled responsible for an event to the mass of WWII, is no idiot. He knew how to lead his country, he was misled in what he wanted to do with it.

Crono · 09-19-2004, 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GiMpY-wAnNaBe

Theres only one small flaw in your arguement Chrono, alright, so they took out a dictator, whom do you believe is worse though? Iraq or North Korea?

And to the risk of sounding like a neo-nazi, Hitler was not an idiot, not even close. Any one man that can be labeled responsible for an event to the mass of WWII, is no idiot. He knew how to lead his country, he was misled in what he wanted to do with it.

When it came to war tactics, he was an idiot. I'd go on and list all the mistakes that HE made for his army, though I'd be here for a while. So he knew how to lead the country... NOT IT's ARMY.

North Korea is just as bad. The people of that country are starving almost to death as we speak. However, with it's proximity to China, I do not think war with North Korea is likely, or even possible. But he should be removed from power also, and the entire Korean peninsula should unite.

GiMpY-wAnNaBe · 09-19-2004, 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crono

When it came to war tactics, he was an idiot. I'd go on and list all the mistakes that HE made for his army, though I'd be here for a while. So he knew how to lead the country... NOT IT's ARMY.

North Korea is just as bad. The people of that country are starving almost to death as we speak. However, with it's proximity to China, I do not think war with North Korea is likely, or even possible. But he should be removed from power also, and the entire Korean peninsula should unite.

...thats like saying losing 1000 men is bush's fault because he doesn't know how to lead a war. He doesn't actually lead it.

Crono · 09-19-2004, 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GiMpY-wAnNaBe

...thats like saying losing 1000 men is bush's fault because he doesn't know how to lead a war. He doesn't actually lead it.

Argh, obviously you don't understand. Hitler had PERSONAL control of his army. There's a damned difference. Hitler basically told them when to do it, where to do it, and how to do it. Bush doesn't do that.

But this is way off topic. I don't want to talk about it anymore.

GiMpY-wAnNaBe · 09-20-2004, 01:05 PM

Fair enough, i didn't know that Hitler personally controlled his army. Thanks for the info.

Anyways. is Bush still in a double digit lead?

Blackmane · 09-20-2004, 01:18 PM

I haven't heard from the same source, but some other paper is saying Kerry took a small gain recently, like a point or two.

Xantar · 09-25-2004, 08:26 PM

Funny fact: if you look at the poll numbers for various battleground states, you will see that it's entirely possible that Kerry will lose the popular vote but win the electoral college. Now how's that for irony? I'm going to pray for that to happen just so somebody will finally get the idea that the voting system needs a major overhaul.