The NFL thread 2004-2005

[ZebraRampage]

Originally Posted by Typhoid

Phhhhffff.


Its all false hope. Thats all it is for you. If the Eagles win the superbowl, the Universe as we know it will cease to exist.

Titans/Seahawks baby.

They still have as good a chance they've had the past three years. Just because they didn't make it in for three years in a row, doesn't mean it can't happen this year. It's a different year. Of course the pressure of missing it three years in a row doesn't help, but the Eagles are still a great team..maybe even better than they were last year, but I don't have anything to back that up since I haven't been paying attention. You know, lately you've been against a lot of people..I think you just do it because you like a good argument/fight.

[GT News]

Originally Posted by ZebraRampage

They still have as good a chance they've had the past three years. Just because they didn't make it in for three years in a row, doesn't mean it can't happen this year. It's a different year. Of course the pressure of missing it three years in a row doesn't help, but the Eagles are still a great team..maybe even better than they were last year, but I don't have anything to back that up since I haven't been paying attention. You know, lately you've been against a lot of people..I think you just do it because you like a good argument/fight.

The anonymous "they".That makes sense to me.
Who does "they" refer to?-D is a year. I suppose that makes sense.Gosh!
Who told you that?Perhaps. Yes, even that.I know very little about

lately you have been against a lot of people

. What kind of it do you like?Me? No I do not it because you like a good argumentfight. Do you?




I answer a lot of silly questions.

[Typhoid]

Originally Posted by ZebraRampage

They still have as good a chance they've had the past three years. Just because they didn't make it in for three years in a row, doesn't mean it can't happen this year. It's a different year. Of course the pressure of missing it three years in a row doesn't help, but the Eagles are still a great team..maybe even better than they were last year, but I don't have anything to back that up since I haven't been paying attention. You know, lately you've been against a lot of people..I think you just do it because you like a good argument/fight.

Naw. I just like the Titans and Seahwaks. Sorry if I like things alot. I will learn to hate them just for you. Maybe that way if I hate everything, i wont say things, then people wont accuse me of falsely doing or saying things that i didnt intend to happen.

Sounds like a plan.



*Starts hating football*



EDIT:

*Reads Zebras new post*


Sorry, i forgot for things to be taken lightly you have to put a "" beside it. I will remember to do that.

*Remembers to do that*

[ZebraRampage]

Originally Posted by Typhoid

Naw. I just like the Titans and Seahwaks. Sorry if I like things alot. I will learn to hate them just for you. Maybe that way if I hate everything, i wont say things, then people wont accuse me of falsely doing or saying things that i didnt intend to happen.

Sounds like a plan.



*Starts hating football*

It wasn't the fact that you like the Titans and Seahawks as being the two teams to get into the Super Bowl, it was the way that you just said there was no hope for the Eagles at all.

"Its all false hope. Thats all it is for you. If the Eagles win the superbowl, the Universe as we know it will cease to exist."

There is hope for any team at the beginning of the season...well more hope for other teams since they're better.

Anyway, about my last comment..I only said that because it of you saying the thing about "false hope". I suppose I didn't really have to say that now that I read over all the comments that were made in this thread between you and I, so just forget about it. All I really want to say is that the Eagles still have a chance at the Super Bowl..

[The Germanator]

Eagles 31
Giants 17

McNabb: 26/36, 4 TD, 0 INT. Spread the ball to seven receivers.

Owens: 6 receptions, 68 yards, 3 TD
Pinkston: 3 receptions, 73 yards.

Westbrook: 17 rushes, 119 yards. 3 receptions, 42 yards.

That's the offense I like to see.

[Bond]

Yeah, against the Giants.

[ZebraRampage]

Originally Posted by The Germanator

Pinkston: 3 receptions, 73 yards.

That's what surprised me, even if it was against the Giants. He actually caught the ball, and that one play was a pretty big one! I guess Owens taught him something.

[dropCGCF]

Go Bills.

Why do I even bother?

[The Germanator]

Originally Posted by ZebraRampage

That's what surprised me, even if it was against the Giants. He actually caught the ball, and that one play was a pretty big one! I guess Owens taught him something.

That's actually not too surprising to me, and I'll tell you why. Todd Pinkston will never ever be a "go-to" type of receiver because he is way too small to go up against the better corners. However, when paired with a "go-to" receiver such as T.O, a secondary talent such as Pinkston can achieve a lot because he is not the main focus of the defense's attention. The problem with last year for Pinkston was that he was the secondary receiver to James Thrash who was, in my opinion, an even more mediocre player than Pinkston. Todd has great hands and speed, and I'm glad that he contributed today, and I expect more of the same.

[Typhoid]

Woo!

Go Seahawks.


Seattle 21
New Orleans 7

Damn rights......baby.

WOO! Titans.

Tennessee 17
Miami 7

Damn rights....baby.



That is all.