Fahrenheit 9/11

[Bond]

Originally Posted by Zaglar Ninja

I'll admit Micheal uses manipulation, but there is no other effective way to get his point across, not many people like to listen about politics, so unless it is in an entertaining video, not many people will care.

The question is, is it wrong to use manipulation to spread facts that everyone should hear?

Thanks for ignoring my previous post directed towards you that made you look really bad, Zaglar.

And more trouble for Michael Moore, even Richard Clarke disagrees with him:

One of the central charges made by left-wing filmmaker Michael Moore in his upcoming, Bush-bashing film is being undermined by another critic of the president -- former White House counter-terrorism czar Richard Clarke.

Moore's upcoming film, Fahrenheit 911, points to President Bush's rumored relationship with Saudi officials as the motivating factor in the president allegedly allowing relatives of terror mastermind Osama bin Laden to fly out of the country following the Sept.11, 2001 terror attacks.

But Clarke recently admitted that he alone approved the exit of the bin Laden kin -- damaging the key premise of Moore's film.

Source

[Stonecutter]

On behalf of the board liberals I concede the point to Strangler and the conservatives based solely on Zaglar Ninja's stupidity.

Shut Up, you make Typhoid look like a Poli-Sci major.

[Typhoid]

Originally Posted by Stonecutter

On behalf of the board liberals I concede the point to Strangler and the conservatives based solely on Zaglar Ninja's stupidity.

So you are willing to concede to a person who believes Mother Teresa was a bad person?

[Professor S]

Originally Posted by Typhoid

So you are willing to concede to a person who believes Mother Teresa was a bad person?

Typhoid, I believe I specifically said that I DIDN'T Mother Theresa was a bad person, just misguided, but then again I can hardly expect you to actually read my posts before making judgements on them can I?

EDIT: LOL!!! I just looked and you even QUOTED me saying she wasn't a bad person. Oh wow, thats just awesome.

But how can you debunk someone on their religious beliefs, I thought you can only debunk lies, not religious stances.

Shes Catholic, so she doesnt believe in birth control, now it wasnt her idea to be against birth control, its her religion.

How can you say someone is wrong based on how they were rasied?

Im sorry, im not catholic, but i cant trust any "debunker" that tried to debunk a saint.

He is debunking the free pass that she gets from the international community and press. Public opinion is that she is one of the most wonderful people who has ever existed, and the truth may be quite different.

Look at your own opinion about her: She is labeled a saint by the Catholic Church and you would rather just take their word for it rather than analyze the situation further. Her teachings may have directly or indirectly caused mass deaths, but since the church named her a Saint she must be beyond reproach. You should question more than just the decisions the US government makes.

Say Strangler, I haven't seen you give the people of Africa condoms either. So aren't you just as responsible for the spread of AIDS as Mother Teresa?

I'm also not over in Africa telling people to NOT wear them. What does what I do have anything to do with Mother Theresa nd what she does? Really, that was a really weak argument Dyflon, bordering on that thin line of irrelevance, and I expect better from you by now.