Harry Potter!!

[Ginkasa]

Of course the new Dumbledore didn't act exactly like Richard Harris. It wouldn't have been good if he did. Everybody knows its a new guy playing Dumbledore, there's no hiding it. I'd rather the actor make the character his own rather than try to imitate Harris.


*shrugs and walks away*

[GiMpY-wAnNaBe]

**SPOILER WARNING**

















The entire firbolt part was horribly done....but other than that i thought it was great. and the actor for hermione is hot.....(shes 17)......the actor for malfoy is different...but he's still decent. i think the actor picks for both lupin and sirius were horrible.......i always pictured sirius as more of an aragorn person. As for lupin, guess it was alright, but his werewolf form looked weak..... The special effects were nice, but most of all, you GOTTA love the jamaican talking head ("Dis iz gonna be a bompy ride!")

[Perfect Stu]

Originally Posted by GiMpY-wAnNaBe

and the actor for hermione is hot.....(shes 17)

she's FOURTEEN, you pedaphile...shes cute, I'll give you that...and she could very well be hot in a few years, but calling a 14 year old hot is just...wrong

the actor for malfoy is different

no it isnt...same as the first two movies

And the movie was great...I really enjoyed it, much better than the first two movies. Better director (makes a world of difference), better story (3rd book was my favourite), better acting. 4 stars.

[Ginkasa]

Its not that pedophilic if you're sixteen, which gimpy is (unless his profile...lies...for some...reason). A girl I know was dating a 17 year old when she was 14 (well...she's still dating him... I think... ages are different of course....16 and 19...).

So... Maybe not so wrong...

Very annoying though. Very, very annoying.


*shrugs and walks away*

[Typhoid]

Just because your friend did it, that doesnt make it not pedephelia. Its still disgustingly wrong...well to me anyways.

[GameMaster]

Ginkasa is wrong. The new Dumbledore replacement needs to act EXACTLY as Richard Harris did. To do otherwise simply ruins the character. It'd be okay if Richard Harris had never been Dumbledore but since he was, the replacements need to follow his interpretation.

[Ginkasa]

Originally Posted by GameMaster

Ginkasa is wrong. The new Dumbledore replacement needs to act EXACTLY as Richard Harris did. To do otherwise simply ruins the character. It'd be okay if Richard Harris had never been Dumbledore but since he was, the replacements need to follow his interpretation.

It ruins the character if one actor tries to perfectly imitate another actor. Acting is like anything else, people do it differently. Faced with the same character, two different actors will always give you two completely different performances. Trying to perform in some way not natural to the actor can ruin his performance. Its better for an actor to portray his own interpretation of the character and perform his best rather than copy someone else and give a mediocre or bad performance.


*shrugs and walks away*