Harry Potter!! - Page 2

Ginkasa · 06-05-2004, 02:21 AM

Oh...well...then...nevermind...

However, I do suggest you read Prisoner of Azkaban, if not the whole series. There is a lot of backhistory and stuff that was left out of the movie that, if it doesn't make anything clearer, is at least interesting. And nice to know.

And the book is always better anyway.

*shrugs and walks away*

Dyne · 06-05-2004, 04:36 AM

My date had a few bones to pick with it but overall we were very entertained.

For one we could definitely tell the difference in directing. The choice of shots was rather different from the previous movies, and it just didn't have that "magical" feel they did.

There IS confusing parts in the movie. But it all becomes clear eventually. It's really not that hard a movie to follow.

Dumbledore's actor apparently changed, too. I didn't even notice; I guess I'm not a stickler for those things. Heh.

Joeiss · 06-05-2004, 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vampyr

Wouldn't something as sad as calling people losers who just walked away "making your night" also qualify you to be a loser? o_O

Nope.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Null

combined with seeing the movie 'day after tomorrow'

actually day after tomorrow is a halarious movie. one of the worst i've ever seen, but halarious. the dialog in it is so unintentially funny.

However, on with harry potter, great movie. saw it at 11pm
all the harry potter movies have been great.

And no Ginkasa, i've never read any of the books and never went 'huh?' once, was completly understandable to me.

"Just tell her how you feel, man."

Haha... That line cracked me up the most.

GameMaster · 06-05-2004, 02:45 PM

I saw Harry Potter last night at 6:00. I liked it a lot. The new Dumbledore doesn't act exactly like the original though. And me and my friends agreed that we missed seeing Dumbledore and Harry have a long talk like they usually do at least once in every movie. And I must say, Hermione has become quite easy on the eyes, if you know what I mean.

Buckbeak was cool too.

Seth · 06-05-2004, 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GameMaster

I saw Harry Potter last night at 6:00. I liked it a lot. The new Dumbledore doesn't act exactly like the original though. And me and my friends agreed that we missed seeing Dumbledore and Harry have a long talk like they usually do at least once in every movie. And I must say, Hermione has become quite easy on the eyes, if you know what I mean.

Buckbeak was cool too.

Yep, gotta love that 13 year old ass

I think I've gotten over the whole Olsen Twins thing though. I still have a hard time shaking the full house images out of my mind. They're...hot.

Typhoid · 06-05-2004, 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bouncer

. I still have a hard time shaking the full house images out of my mind. They're...hot.

Ya.....those pre-pubecent days didn't really do it for me. But now, well they are hot, but the novelty is starting to wear off. Kind of like an over-hyped game, thats been hyped up for like, 7 years, then comes out and sucks.

GameMaster · 06-05-2004, 04:11 PM

A few weeks ago some magazines had some pictures of them at some premiere for their movie or something, and one of them is noticeably thin and the magazines acknowledged this. She was bony, eww.

Ginkasa · 06-05-2004, 06:06 PM

Of course the new Dumbledore didn't act exactly like Richard Harris. It wouldn't have been good if he did. Everybody knows its a new guy playing Dumbledore, there's no hiding it. I'd rather the actor make the character his own rather than try to imitate Harris.

*shrugs and walks away*

GiMpY-wAnNaBe · 06-05-2004, 11:53 PM

**SPOILER WARNING**

The entire firbolt part was horribly done....but other than that i thought it was great. and the actor for hermione is hot.....(shes 17)......the actor for malfoy is different...but he's still decent. i think the actor picks for both lupin and sirius were horrible.......i always pictured sirius as more of an aragorn person. As for lupin, guess it was alright, but his werewolf form looked weak..... The special effects were nice, but most of all, you GOTTA love the jamaican talking head ("Dis iz gonna be a bompy ride!")

Perfect Stu · 06-06-2004, 12:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GiMpY-wAnNaBe

and the actor for hermione is hot.....(shes 17)

she's FOURTEEN, you pedaphile...shes cute, I'll give you that...and she could very well be hot in a few years, but calling a 14 year old hot is just...wrong

Quote:

the actor for malfoy is different

no it isnt...same as the first two movies

And the movie was great...I really enjoyed it, much better than the first two movies. Better director (makes a world of difference), better story (3rd book was my favourite), better acting. 4 stars.

Ginkasa · 06-06-2004, 01:26 AM

Its not that pedophilic if you're sixteen, which gimpy is (unless his profile...lies...for some...reason). A girl I know was dating a 17 year old when she was 14 (well...she's still dating him... I think... ages are different of course....16 and 19...).

So... Maybe not so wrong...

Very annoying though. Very, very annoying.

*shrugs and walks away*

Typhoid · 06-06-2004, 03:33 AM

Just because your friend did it, that doesnt make it not pedephelia. Its still disgustingly wrong...well to me anyways.

GameMaster · 06-06-2004, 03:10 PM

Ginkasa is wrong. The new Dumbledore replacement needs to act EXACTLY as Richard Harris did. To do otherwise simply ruins the character. It'd be okay if Richard Harris had never been Dumbledore but since he was, the replacements need to follow his interpretation.

Yugi Starwind · 06-06-2004, 06:13 PM

It was good. saw it on opening night. also saw kitana in the same theater after the movie

Ginkasa · 06-06-2004, 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GameMaster

Ginkasa is wrong. The new Dumbledore replacement needs to act EXACTLY as Richard Harris did. To do otherwise simply ruins the character. It'd be okay if Richard Harris had never been Dumbledore but since he was, the replacements need to follow his interpretation.

It ruins the character if one actor tries to perfectly imitate another actor. Acting is like anything else, people do it differently. Faced with the same character, two different actors will always give you two completely different performances. Trying to perform in some way not natural to the actor can ruin his performance. Its better for an actor to portray his own interpretation of the character and perform his best rather than copy someone else and give a mediocre or bad performance.

*shrugs and walks away*