Perfect Dark, not until 2005

Jonbo298 · 05-03-2004, 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Perfect Stu

of course you dont...

Null · 05-03-2004, 05:46 PM

i guess maybe if you dont like it your a fanboy? *shrugs*

Jonbo298 · 05-03-2004, 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Null

i guess maybe if you dont like it your a fanboy? *shrugs*

I dunno. I'm confused on his response.

Perfect Stu · 05-03-2004, 07:38 PM

what were the chances that you were going to like one of Rare's characters that now belongs to MS instead of Nintendo? honestly?

for some reason your answer "I dont like it" didnt surprise me.

Null · 05-03-2004, 07:40 PM

could be that he just doesnt like it.

Perfect Stu · 05-03-2004, 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Null

could be that he just doesnt like it.

of course it could be

Jonbo298 · 05-03-2004, 09:50 PM

I dont like the look of Conker. What's wrong with that? They made him too furry. He doesnt look similar to his '64 counterpart. blah blah blah, I know its the XBox now, but they made him too furry.

Bond · 05-03-2004, 09:53 PM

So if Rare made Conker this same "too furry" look on the Nintendo GameCube you would feel the same way? Because you have to admit Rare was praised a lot around here when they were owned by Nintendo, and now that they are owned by Microsoft they are borderline hated.

Perfect Stu · 05-03-2004, 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bond

So if Rare made Conker this same "too furry" look on the Nintendo GameCube you would feel the same way? Because you have to admit Rare was praised a lot around here when they were owned by Nintendo, and now that they are owned by Microsoft they are borderline hated.

someone knows where I'm coming from

I'm not accusing you of anything, Jonbo...jumping to conclusions is a waste of time and effort...but I agree with Bond...I question your genuinity/sincerity due to possibly a clouded judgement

Hero2 · 05-03-2004, 10:53 PM

Well rare was alot bigger newer and fresher when they were with Nintendo. They havent had a game thats stood out since then. ecept Conker and PD:0 and those arnt out yet and they keep crapping out on dates witch is not good for there rep. and you cant call me a fanboy for ninteno and have it be true I hate my gamecube and regret buying the peice of crap.

Null · 05-03-2004, 10:59 PM

IMO, you guys are sounding just as clouded, opposite of what your saying about him.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bond

So if Rare made Conker this same "too furry" look on the Nintendo GameCube you would feel the same way? Because you have to admit Rare was praised a lot around here when they were owned by Nintendo, and now that they are owned by Microsoft they are borderline hated.

You have to admit, there is a HUGE difference from thier nintendo days.

In thier nintendo days they made some of the best games on the console. They started going downhill at the end of the nintendo days. i cant help but think a lot of xbox fans didnt pick up on this because of the excitment of getting rare. But starfox sucked. and whatever game that was they released since... grabbed by the goulies? even worse. Many magazines have already pointed out when they showed conker that it looked like a snoozer and saying that kameo looks kinda

People started making mention of rares lack of quality when they were still with nintendo (except of course for the uber fans who would never say such

)

Maybe the reason they're delaying these games is that they're working on making them a lot lot better, but untill i personally see another good one from them. i cant help but feel as they're losing it. it has nothing to do with nintendo.
I really hope they turn out some good ones. expecially one with the power of grabbing fans like PD.

Jonbo298 · 05-03-2004, 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bond

So if Rare made Conker this same "too furry" look on the Nintendo GameCube you would feel the same way? Because you have to admit Rare was praised a lot around here when they were owned by Nintendo, and now that they are owned by Microsoft they are borderline hated.

YES, I would feel the same way. Jesus, I'm not a flaming raging Nintendo fanboy.

Blix · 05-05-2004, 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bond

So if Rare made Conker this same "too furry" look on the Nintendo GameCube you would feel the same way? Because you have to admit Rare was praised a lot around here when they were owned by Nintendo, and now that they are owned by Microsoft they are borderline hated.

I don't like the model either and I don't think there's anything biased in it. I personally would hate it the same if it was in the GC. And really, are you that impressed with what rare has done so far this generation? Rare hasn't really made me happy of owning one of their games since the late N64 days (Perfect Dark and Conker being the only two exceptions). I was hoping for the company to return to its roots of great gameplay mechanics and productivity but man, my patience isn't infite. Star Fox left a bad taste in me and the company takes foever and a day to make one game now. Not only that but Rare now kept only their name becuase most of their talent went away.I.e. they're pretty much an empty shell IMO. So who knows how the games might turn out to be? I am still expecting PD and Conker but this conker model (Suposing it is not a joke. And I think they changed Perfect Dark to cell shading which is really far from what the series began like) is really bringing my hopes even lower. If they don't really deliver with these games I might just forget about the existence of the company.

So this goes from waaaaay before the company was bought by Microsoft. Really, I think it's a cheap scapegoat to frame every one who dislikes rare stuff now as a fanboy. You better come up with something else.