Physics problem

[thatmariolover]

Originally Posted by Canyarion

Mariolover, sorry but you're talking crap. I've asked some people (much older than you, IF that matters) that KNOW their physics.

Look, if you don't want answers, don't ask any questions. You don't have to be an ass about it. I've taken Physics myself. Maybe I'm wrong. I'm pretty sure I'm not, and I've had quite a number of people on here back me up.

Seriously. I'm not going to post in this thread again (and frankly, I probably just won't post in any thread that you ask a question in; because clearly you only want to hear what you already believe). This is getting rediculous. Goodnight.

[Jonbo298]

Originally Posted by thatmariolover

Look, if you don't want answers, don't ask any questions. You don't have to be an ass about it. I've taken Physics myself. Maybe I'm wrong. I'm pretty sure I'm not, and I've had quite a number of people on here back me up.

Seriously. I'm not going to post in this thread again (and frankly, I probably just won't post in any thread that you ask a question in; because clearly you only want to hear what you already believe). This is getting rediculous. Goodnight.

*is still mesmerized at the milk avatar*

[Canyarion]

Take it easy man...
So far I've heard more things that prove me right than that prove me wrong.

It's all about efficiency. A bow is efficient, especially an Elfen bow. If using 3 arrows would be more efficient, why wouldn't they just use heavier arrows??

Just common sense, as stated in the 2nd post here.

[Bube]

Reviving this 10 day old thread to say that my friend tried it out. He says that he's "absoloutely sure" that the single arrow and the group of arrows went the same distance and went in to the same depth. So that makes 3 arrows more lethal.

Case closed, I guess...