Halo creator Bungie rumored to be leaving Microsoft.

[jeepnut]

Even as copies of Halo 3 have barely reached gamers' hands, reports have claimed that its developer Bungie may jump ship from Microsoft to pursue other games, and potentially other game platforms.



A source speaking with the Seattle Post-Intelligencer fueled discussion by alleging that Bungie had already declared its intent to leave its parent company, making the public announcement only a formality. Microsoft had reportedly agreed to the decision and had already been removing Bungie staff from its official roster as of Monday, with only concerns over affecting quarterly results (due October 6th) keeping either side from making a full announcement.

The decision by the game developer to walk away from what many have described as a lucrative partnership was not trivial, the insider claimed. Rather, the issue for Bungie was control over its own fate, which became more and more elusive as the firm's Halo games grew in popularity and Microsoft saw the game house as a dependable source of revenue.

"Apparently MS just wants Bungie to make Halo for the rest of their natural days," the source wrote in an e-mail message. "Bungie doesn't like how MS is constantly trying to 'handle' everything they do; the way they market their games, the way they interact with their fans [...], and how stingie [sic] they are with the profits (comparable to the rest of the industry)."

A separate tip handed to GameInformer appeared to corroborate the story and added that Microsoft's compensation was to earn both the rights to future Halo games and the right to first refusal, which would let the Xbox 360 maker become the first possible candidate to publish any future Bungie title.

Microsoft did not refute the claim outright, instead telling Kotaku that it had not publicized any agreement. "There's been no such announcement," said a spokesperson from Microsoft's public relations firm, Edelman. "We continue to celebrate the tremendous success of the global phenomenon that is Halo 3."

In spite of the conditions that would be attached to the deal, the departure would effectively return Bungie to the independent status it held before Microsoft's acquisition of the studio in June 2000 and would free the company to pursue games for non-Microsoft platforms, including the Mac, PlayStation 3, and Wii.

Interesting bit of news. It would seem that Bungie is ready to move past Halo, but Microsoft is reluctant to let them try new things.

UPDATE: Well, it happened. Bungie is no longer a wholly owned subsidiary of Microsoft. As of right now, this will not change anything. Microsoft still has the rights to all Halo related properties and the right to first refusal of any new Bungie titles, but it does open the door to possible cross-platform Bungie games. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.

[gekko]

Bungie should've thought of this before they were bought by Microsoft. They could've signed on as an exclusive developer, and not been outright purchased.

[Angrist]

Somehow this thread didn't show up as new, or I overlooked it.

[jeepnut]

Eh. It doesn't seem like anyone cares anyway.

[Angrist]

Yeah well what can you say? They were Microsoft's slaves, just making Halo games for them. Kind of like Retro Studios was for Nintendo. I hope both studios get to do something different, since they must be tired of those games now.

And Gekko, they probably received lotsa buncha money which they could spend on the development of Halo. Now they leave with a lot more money than they had, so I think it was a good deal for the both of them.

[Professor S]

Originally Posted by Angrist

Yeah well what can you say? They were Microsoft's slaves, just making Halo games for them. Kind of like Retro Studios was for Nintendo. I hope both studios get to do something different, since they must be tired of those games now.

And Gekko, they probably received lotsa buncha money which they could spend on the development of Halo. Now they leave with a lot more money than they had, so I think it was a good deal for the both of them.

I think this move was more for tax purposes than anything else. They are still partly owned by Microsoft. It also might have been part of their original merger agreement to eventually have a sofy split from MS.

In the end I doubt this changes much of anything.