Game Informer: DualShock 3 - Page 5

The Duggler · 03-28-2005, 03:09 PM

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4387045.stm

Here's another proof that Sony is not innovative. They just copy stuff.

MuGen · 03-28-2005, 03:15 PM

this has been discussed already in it's own thread.

The Duggler · 03-28-2005, 03:36 PM

really?

I'll check it out.

Null · 03-28-2005, 03:51 PM

lol. strange funny little guy.

curious tho, note tho i never said sony or anyone else was innovative or not innovative.. But if they go after Nintendo next for thier rumble, considering they went after MS, then Sony, does that mean nintendo is not innovative? cuz an example for one should be same as the example on the other. or will you just make up another excuse?

note i never said they will or even can go after nintendo, only IF.

MuGen · 03-28-2005, 04:09 PM

To be quite honest, the only innovation was the first ever console.

Ever since then it's been improved graphics and gameplay.

I wouldn't say a respective brand is innovative at the least. However there are respective innovations worth noting.

Nintendo Touch Screen
Sony's EyeToy (more than just a webcam gimmick)
A lot of Pelican accessories.

Case and point.... Things have been innovative through out timelines upon timelines. But I would never go so far as to say one company has been innovative their whole time in the industry.