What would you like to see at E3 this year?

[Vampyr]

Originally Posted by BLueFire

And honestly, something new.

Word.

[magus113]

Team ICO's new PS3 game, which I've heard is SotC2 or something? That'd be awesome.

Something else for the PS3 that exclusive and not gonna get delayed for two years just like everything else that they've started making for it.

Star Ocean 4 footage, new Chrono footage, a Wii Zelda game that DOESN'T look like a GCN port please?

RE5, Silent Hill 5, Elite Beat Agents 2, some new original PSP stuff that it's cutesy like LocoRoco (although I enjoyed it a lot).

Some new Kingdom Hearts footage, and yes I'm including the mobile, PSP, and DS titles that are being used to milk the franchise for all it's worth.

Duke Nukem Forever? Fat chance.

[Angrist]

That's funny. When I predicted 5 months ago that they would show a new Zelda at E³, most people said it was too early. We'll see. I know I got at least a 1000 hits because of that blog entry.

[Dyne]

Originally Posted by magus113

a Wii Zelda game that DOESN'T look like a GCN port please?

That might be tough to pull off while keeping / expanding on the scope of Twilight Princess. I get the feeling that Super Mario Galaxy really maxed the Wii out, but only because it was done on small-scale style levels. For the large open-world Zelda, it might have to take a hit in graphics.

[Fyacin]

I really want to see new zelda, some kind of info on new Metroid, new Fire Emblem(preferably on DS), info on the Wii Crystal Chronicles, New Star Fox for wii (that doesn't suck), Pikmin 3, some Halo Wars stuff, some Bioshock 2 stuff, maybe some Elder Scrolls 5 stuff, and lots of starcraft. Kid Icarus would be welcome too That new prince of persia looks interesting as well, the graphic style is quite intrigueing.
Speaking of graphics, as far as Wii games go, I don't really care. I mean, when it's obviously lazy and sub-par graphic job (Fire Emblem) I get mad, but stuff like Zelda, and Metroid is already good enough for me, and I care far more about gameplay and story then their graphics at this point.

[magus113]

Originally Posted by Fyacin

Speaking of graphics, as far as Wii games go, I don't really care. I mean, when it's obviously lazy and sub-par graphic job (Fire Emblem) I get mad, but stuff like Zelda, and Metroid is already good enough for me, and I care far more about gameplay and story then their graphics at this point.

I guess it came off as I was hating on the Wii's graphics, which I'm not. I love solid gameplay as much as the next hardcore gamer, especially when it comes to Nintendo's star franchises that always find a way to bring something new to the table.

Some part of me is still convinced that the Wii still has somewhere to go visually, albeit it might not be very far of course.

Originally Posted by Dyne

I get the feeling that Super Mario Galaxy really maxed the Wii out, but only because it was done on small-scale style levels.

It seems that maybe some space limitations on the media they're using to distribute the games could also be another problem. Brawl was fitted onto a dual-layer DVD because of the movies and it suffered from some in-game loading issues, etc. That would definitely cut back on having games like Zelda where things need to be happening constanty.