the grammys... - Page 3

RagedHybrid · 02-14-2005, 02:09 PM

To me, the grammies are as political as the oscars so it's not even worth wasting time arguing about it

Null · 02-14-2005, 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RagedHybrid

To me, the grammies are as political as the oscars so it's not even worth wasting time arguing about it

true none of its worth arguing about. I dont mind the oscars tho, they award good movies majority of the time. that usually cant be said for the grammys tho, its amazing some of the horrible stuff that wins a grammy somtimes. as i said before, just a big popularity contest.

MuGen · 02-14-2005, 02:25 PM

I respect Green Day for their talent and their drive, but as soon as they decided to include politics in their songs, I stopped listening to them, and thats just me. So, no rebuttle is required for that statement.

On the other grammy decisions.... joke... J... O...K .. E...

why? Best New Artist should've been SOMETHING CORPORATE. Probably none of you have heard of them, but new artist none the less. Their music is amazing...and definitely better than Maroon 5... and of course... thats IMO.

KillerGremlin · 02-14-2005, 04:11 PM

I don't know......I give bands credit where it's due. I'd rather see bands that have more talent and orginality win Grammys, but if you are a band that rips other bands off but play entertaining music, then whatever. Let's not forget that even "rock legends" like Zeppelin "borrowed" their fair shair of riffs.

I like what sounds good......original, contrived, over-produced, or not. I'll give credit where it's due, but I won't not listen to it.

ulala06 · 02-14-2005, 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kyuzo

why? Best New Artist should've been SOMETHING CORPORATE. Probably none of you have heard of them, but new artist none the less. Their music is amazing...and definitely better than Maroon 5... and of course... thats IMO.

something corporate aren't new.

no offense or anything. they're a pretty good band, better lyrics than music.