 |
Re: GO LEAFS GO |
 |
05-04-2004, 11:57 PM
|
#16
|
Banned
The Germanator is offline
Location: Pennsylvania
Now Playing: The Legend of Zelda : Twilight Princess
Posts: 6,031
|
Re: GO LEAFS GO
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stonecutter
Amonte, Roenick, Zhamnov: all former hawks, all on the same line in Philly, (AKA the Blackhawk Down line) Philly is east of Chicago.
|
Yes, and thank you very much for them! Flyers would be nothing without that line.
|
|
|
 |
Re: GO LEAFS GO |
 |
05-05-2004, 12:20 PM
|
#17
|
Devourer of Worlds
Professor S is offline
Location: Mount Penn, PA
Now Playing: Team Fortress 2, all day everyday
Posts: 6,608
|
Re: GO LEAFS GO
Funny how Chicago never managed to do anything with them, though.
__________________
|
|
|
 |
Re: GO LEAFS GO |
 |
05-05-2004, 12:41 PM
|
#18
|
The Nullified One
Null is offline
Location: Hockeytown, MI
Now Playing: Counter-Strike: Source
Posts: 4,966
|
Re: GO LEAFS GO
Chicago was decent when they had them. i remember the conference finals between hawks and wings in 95? i think
i hope chicago gets going again, my 2nd fav team along with the leafs.
__________________
DS Friends Code:
300 721 299 757
Wii Friends Code:
4481 4992 4915 9887
|
|
|
 |
Re: GO LEAFS GO |
 |
05-05-2004, 01:38 PM
|
#19
|
Knight
Perfect Stu is offline
Location: Toronto
Now Playing: GTA4
Posts: 6,158
|
Re: GO LEAFS GO
Well, at least Tucker punked Kapenen. Easily one of the hardest hits I've ever seen. Do you think Sami realizes that they've won yet? 
__________________
-Perfect Stu-
"You do NOT want to scare me, junior"
|
|
|
 |
Re: GO LEAFS GO |
 |
05-05-2004, 03:12 PM
|
#20
|
Pinned by Dyne on Festivus
Joeiss is offline
Location: Toronto
Now Playing: SOCOM: US Navy SEALS
Posts: 5,431
|
Re: GO LEAFS GO
Was Belfour on Blackhawks in 95? Or was he allready in Dallas?
__________________
Joe + iss = Joeiss
|
|
|
 |
Re: GO LEAFS GO |
 |
05-05-2004, 03:28 PM
|
#21
|
The Nullified One
Null is offline
Location: Hockeytown, MI
Now Playing: Counter-Strike: Source
Posts: 4,966
|
Re: GO LEAFS GO
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joeiss
Was Belfour on Blackhawks in 95? Or was he allready in Dallas?
|
yea, he was on Hawks
Hawks had Amonte (i think) , Roenick, Chelios, Belfour. not sure bout the others, but they were quite decent.
__________________
DS Friends Code:
300 721 299 757
Wii Friends Code:
4481 4992 4915 9887
|
|
|
 |
Re: GO LEAFS GO |
 |
05-05-2004, 05:53 PM
|
#22
|
Knight
Stonecutter is offline
Now Playing:
Posts: 1,913
|
Re: GO LEAFS GO
The Blackhawks made the playoffs for 16 or 17 straight seasons. They were in the Stanley Cup Finals in 1992 (swept by Pittsburgh) and they made the western conference finals in 95 and lost to the wings 4 games to 1, all 4 of Detroit's wins were by one goal. That 95 team had Cheilos, Amonte, Belfour, Bernie Nichols (who still had some left in the tank at the time) Joe Murphy (same) Keith Carney, and Bob Probert. Jeremy Roenick was on the team but he missed most of 95 after Darien Hatchetman Hatcher destroyed his knee in a game (I think that was the knee year, but it may have been the jaw year, I don't remember.)
ESPN recently named the Blackhawks the worst franchise in sports and I couldn't agree more. They simply refuse to spend money, and they now average just over 10,000 people a night. This from a franchise that used to sell out every single home game.
The ownership here is so spiteful; the home games aren't even televised.
As if all that wasn't enough to make hawk fans puke, right when that team was coming together in 1992, their coach was Mike Keenan. He was fired because he wanted control of personal. What did he want to do?
He was going to trade Ed Balfour for Joe Sakic, and put his faith in his backup goaltender.......
Dominic Hasek.
__________________
|
|
|
 |
Re: GO LEAFS GO |
 |
05-05-2004, 07:52 PM
|
#23
|
Pinned by Dyne on Festivus
Joeiss is offline
Location: Toronto
Now Playing: SOCOM: US Navy SEALS
Posts: 5,431
|
Re: GO LEAFS GO
Is all of that true?
__________________
Joe + iss = Joeiss
|
|
|
 |
Re: GO LEAFS GO |
 |
05-05-2004, 08:28 PM
|
#24
|
Anthropomorphic
Typhoid is offline
Location: New Caladonia
Now Playing:
Posts: 9,511
|
Re: GO LEAFS GO
All of that is true....and i couldnt stand not having games Televised...all but i think 7 or 8 games of the Canucks wernt Televised. But out of the 70 or so games on T.V. there were about 10 on Pay Per View for like $10. I think thats better than having 20 games un-televised.
Do the other hockey cities do the Pay Per View game thing too...or just us?
__________________
Fingerbang:
1.) The sexual act where a finger is inserted into the vagina or anus.
Headbang:
1.) To vigorously nod your head up and down.
|
|
|
 |
Re: GO LEAFS GO |
 |
05-05-2004, 08:34 PM
|
#25
|
Godlike
Crono is offline
Location: Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
Now Playing:
Posts: 2,246
|
Re: GO LEAFS GO
Quote:
Originally Posted by Typhoid
All of that is true....and i couldnt stand not having games Televised...all but i think 7 or 8 games of the Canucks wernt Televised. But out of the 70 or so games on T.V. there were about 10 on Pay Per View for like $10. I think thats better than having 20 games un-televised.
Do the other hockey cities do the Pay Per View game thing too...or just us?
|
Every saturday night game for the Leafs is on CBC, no matter what. And during playoffs they air every game. Weekday games for the Leafs are usually aired on TSN or SportsNet.
|
|
|
 |
Re: GO LEAFS GO |
 |
05-05-2004, 08:36 PM
|
#26
|
Banned
The Germanator is offline
Location: Pennsylvania
Now Playing: The Legend of Zelda : Twilight Princess
Posts: 6,031
|
Re: GO LEAFS GO
Pretty much every Flyers is game is on Comcast Sportsnet (basic cable) here. There aren't many (if any) games that aren't either broadcast on CSN or ABC, or occasionally UPN 57 I believe.
|
|
|
 |
Re: GO LEAFS GO |
 |
05-05-2004, 08:58 PM
|
#27
|
Anthropomorphic
Typhoid is offline
Location: New Caladonia
Now Playing:
Posts: 9,511
|
Re: GO LEAFS GO
So none of yours are on PPV????? the Canucks games are either on CBC on Saturdays...TSN on select Wed/Thurs and then Sports net Pacific the rest that arnt on PPV..
This makes me feel like we (Canuck fans) are getting screwed out of a few free televised games... 
__________________
Fingerbang:
1.) The sexual act where a finger is inserted into the vagina or anus.
Headbang:
1.) To vigorously nod your head up and down.
|
|
|
 |
RE: Re: GO LEAFS GO |
 |
05-05-2004, 08:58 PM
|
#28
|
Telling it like it is
GT News is offline
Location: On a server
Now Playing:
Posts: 2,323
|
RE: Re: GO LEAFS GO
Quote:
Originally Posted by Typhoid
So none of yours are on PPV????? the Canucks games are either on CBC on Saturdays...TSN on select Wed/Thurs and then Sports net Pacific the rest that arnt on PPV..
This makes me feel like we (Canuck fans) are getting screwed out of a few free televised games... 
|
Yeah that's right. Some of them could be though.Tell me more.What is your real name?
What does "this" refer to?I do not understand.
__________________
You heard it here first.
|
|
|
 |
Re: GO LEAFS GO |
 |
05-05-2004, 09:06 PM
|
#29
|
Interrogator
Rndm_Perfection is offline
Location: St. Joseph, Michigan
Now Playing: Valkyrie Profile
Posts: 1,716
|
Re: GO LEAFS GO
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamFuBot
What is your real name?
|
Somebody doesn't read the GameTavern news.
|
|
|
 |
Re: GO LEAFS GO |
 |
05-05-2004, 09:59 PM
|
#30
|
Pinned by Dyne on Festivus
Joeiss is offline
Location: Toronto
Now Playing: SOCOM: US Navy SEALS
Posts: 5,431
|
Re: GO LEAFS GO
Pay to watch games? THat must suck... I get all the Leaf games I think....
But there is LeafsTV... and I assume that once the contracts with CBC and others runs out, you'll have to pay to get LeafsTV o watch games...
__________________
Joe + iss = Joeiss
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:11 PM. |
|
|
|
|