Bush is at it again... - Page 2

09-07-2002, 10:55 PM

Lollipops and gumdrops for all

DarkMaster · 09-07-2002, 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by -apu-
*starts kneeling and offers to give all members of GT as sacrifice*

you aint giving me as a sacrifice!! take crono instead, i know where he lives...

One Winged Angel · 09-07-2002, 11:16 PM

Lol... u guys are so ****in stupid. Bush is not goin to break up the UN just because he wants to get rid of Sadaam. The UN has disagreed on many things before. Bush is not going to break up the UN just because some people dont agree. You guys always find a way to blame all of the world's problems on Bush.

DarkMaster · 09-07-2002, 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by One Winged Angel
You guys always find a way to blame all of the world's problems on Bush.

true, but we gotta blame someone right?

-apu- · 09-07-2002, 11:34 PM

No, but you gotta admit that Bush is makin some ****ed up decisions, and some even more ****ed up statements, like
"It is ridiculus to sacrifice yourself and kill innocent people over a false religion" I think that thats what he said, but thats just ludicrous, because he can't say that someone elses religion is wrong and his is right, because taht way he won't stay prez for very long.....

Heyyoudvd · 09-08-2002, 01:46 AM

Why does anyone give a flying **** about the UN?

What does the UN ever do to benefity the world? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!

All the UN is, is a giant orgnization filled with anti-semites and anti-americans. They have nothing better to do than criticize the US and Israel all day.

Let me ask you this: Where was the UN when 1 million Tutsies (SP?) were murdered in Africa? (I believe it was Rwanda). They were there, but Kofi Annan, just decided to pull out. Why does no one ever accuse HIM of comitting crimes against humanity?

Anyways, as I was saying, the UN is an absolute joke. For god-sake, they even have Syria on the security council!!!

Syria has the most terrorist headquarters of any country in the entire world (especially in Damascus).

Anyways, I for one, could not give a crap about what the UN whines about.

I'm glad Bush is actually taking action against Iraq. I don't see how in the world anyone can not support this.

-apu- · 09-08-2002, 02:14 AM

Ummm.....i'm usually against openly saying that someones opinion is wrong but in this case, ummm....i'm gonna have to make an exception....

HOW THE **** CAN YOU SAY THAT THE UN IS USELESS!!!!!!!!!!
I'll tell you who gives a flying **** about the UN, anybody who wants peace in this messed up world, I mean for Christs sake, the UN is the biggest organizer of charaties around the world for one. Another thing, you know those boxes that they drop from airplanes over oppressed countries full of supplies???? Who the **** do you think drops those??? SANTA CLAUSE?!!?!? THE EASTER BUNNY?!?!?!?!? And Bush is a retard if he thinks that he can just start a war against Iraq without thinking of the consequences!!!!
Does he think that if he takes out Iraq, that'll be all??? That it'll just be over, just *POP* done???? Iraq has allies, they go down, allies go against US, and if the UN is gone, who the **** is going to stop all this s*** from happening??? If UN is gone, say hello to a new set of attacks that'll make 9/11 look like a joke!!!!!!!

Bond · 09-08-2002, 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DarkMaster
hes just looking for a reason to start a war acusing Sadam of having nukes (even though he probly does) and he wants canadians to back him up. my ass, hes just like his father, always looking for trouble.

If you don't know anything about the situation then please just don't comment. No one knows whether or not Sadaam has weapons of mass destruction (at least the public). And we don't need Canada to help us to attack Iraq. They wouldn't be able to do hardly anything. We would have Great Britain's help and a few other countries. Guess where the majority of your weapons come from DarkMaster? I agree with gekko on most things here, we already had an intelligent discussion about this.

None of the allies want to help us attack Iraq because they are in no position to do so. Saudi Arabia is just a kingdom with oil, they are not a democracy. Iraq is a threat, but none of the neighboring countries want to actually risk their lives to save themselves. That is who Arabs are. They only care about themselves, and won't risk anything until death is knocking on their door. Attacking Iraq for us is really not a problem. The problem is that what Iran and other countries that support terrorism might do. And what even Irsael might do with the weapons we funded them to buy and build. Someone always has to take charge in the world and that is normally the United States, at least for now. We provide finical aid, aid for medications, all over the world. If you want to tell us we are bad people than we can pull all of our troops out of places around the world, stop all the aid, and only care for ourselves. Then there will be World War 3, and we will be doing just great. Several countries are defenseless without us, one being Japan.

Bush will not brake the UN, that is just plain stupid to think that. But hey, where do you think the majority of the funding for the UN comes from? Oh, you guessed it...

DarkMaster · 09-08-2002, 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bond
If you don't know anything about the situation then please just don't comment.

its wut i heard, dont call me stupid, i'm just ignorant to the situation.

gekko · 09-08-2002, 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by -apu-
No, but you gotta admit that Bush is makin some ****ed up decisions, and some even more ****ed up statements, like
"It is ridiculus to sacrifice yourself and kill innocent people over a false religion" I think that thats what he said, but thats just ludicrous, because he can't say that someone elses religion is wrong and his is right, because taht way he won't stay prez for very long.....

Actually, coming from a country that's mostly Christians, he would stay president for a while, and I'm pretty sure most of us wouldn't give a damn. But that's not the point.

The point is you need to stop misquoting people. I can garauntee he didn't say that, because I haven't heard of it, and I watch the news channels for hours every day, trust me, it would be on. Now if you want to reword things, it's likely he said something along the lines of a false belief, or even the false religion practice, referring to radical Islam. The Al Qaeda terrorists did this stuff in the name of God, because God told them to do so in the Quaran. Think is, it really don't say that, they're just interpretting it the wrong way, thus we have radical Islam.

-apu- · 09-08-2002, 12:32 PM

You just said it yourself, he said something along the lines of them believing in a "false religion or belief", and I remember when he said it live on CNN......

Mechadragon · 09-08-2002, 01:02 PM

My brains not awake this early in the morning, and my debating skills are pretty bad anyway. I believe I will just watch...

gekko · 09-08-2002, 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by -apu-
You just said it yourself, he said something along the lines of them believing in a "false religion or belief", and I remember when he said it live on CNN......

There you go again misquoting people. Learn to read, or learn to keep your mouth shut.

DeathsHand · 09-08-2002, 06:02 PM

I could see how people would wanna go and attack Iraq because it seems so obvious he has weapons of mass destruction and the like...

But what if he doesn't?

And we go in and occupy the country and all because we thought something that ended up not being true...

Not to mention Iraq hasn't even done anything to us directly yet, so it's like yeah...

Basically, I could see why it seems people are so split on this issue...

I personally don't care, but a war would make the news more fun to watch...

gekko · 09-08-2002, 09:41 PM

We've had troops in Iraq for the past 3 months. I'm pretty sure we got good intelligence from our recon.