Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason1
It is my opinion that if the Union had a contract which was violated by the state of California, then they damn well should have the money brought back to them. A contract is a contract and thats some serious bullshit if they can just simply violate that contract with no repurcussions.
|
Tell that to Chrysler's stakeholders...
Beyond that, it is not the in the Executive branch's power to enforce contracts. That falls with the judicial branch. Something tells me that if the state of California really couldn't break the union contracts, this federal interference wouldn't have been necessary. The union could have simply taken the case to court and the action would have been stayed until trial if they had a case.
But that is exactly what we're talking about here: The executive brach's assumption of powers that they do not have nor are entitled to.
Man, out schools need to do WAY better job of teaching civics...