MGS4 Article in NYTimes

[Renwood]

You can use real world terminology without actually tackling the issue in a meaningful way though, lol.

There are rare glimmers of honest insight, like Drebin's comments on the role of the U.N., post-MGS4. A point was made there. A clear point. The rest is far too vague to be useful.

"War economy" and "proxy wars" are thrown around by nearly every character, but where the latter are never properly defined, even with the context of the story (the motivation for countries to hire PMCs in an age where there is no motivation for wars, since they are meaningless, still escapes me), and the former is a strange, strange idea. There is no war economy. There's just economy.