Quote:
Originally posted by BigJustinW
Ridley, Link... my point is that developers can't be classified in parties... but games can be.
|
Oh, I see now, that actually makes a bit of sense there.
But to play devils advocate, couldn't people use these terms for the developers at ceratin periods in their cycle of existence?
For example, right now, would you agree with me that Nintendo are a first party? What if, say 10 years down the line, something happens, and Nintendo no longer make consoles, in ither words, go the way of sega. They would actuallyno longer be a 1st party. But rather, something else.
Unless ofcourse you say that Nintendo 'games' are first party, and the company itself as developers cannot be defined as a particular party?
Threaded Mode
