Strangler, this shouldn't be an argument between Austin and Bret, I only brought him up to compare their situations, which you somehow alter freely to make Austin a hero and Bret a piece of ****.
As for the fact/rumour thing... I never believed the things from 1wrestling were facts (but for you, it's a fact if it comes from 1wrestling and it's convenient, but a rumour if you're arguing against it apparently), I tried putting "as far as we know" "from all sources" etc. before most of what I said, so it's quite obvious you're just finding any little thing to falt me for.
Here's my problem with your whole argument though: "I'd rather take Austin's word for it" Oh, how suprising. You know my bias with nWo, now you must know how I feel because of your bias with anything not nWo, and in this case, Steve Austin. Anyhoo, just think for half a damn second... Do you think Austin would say anything to make himself look like the "badguy" here? This doesn't take a scientist... My biasm for nWo isn't even in the same league as yours for Austin right now. That's like taking OJ's word for it that he didn't kill his wife.
Oh yeah, and I conveniently excluded some columnists opinions on the Austin situation? LMAO. Nice try. I don't give a rat's ass about their opinions, I'm getting the facts, or what's closest to facts that we can get, unlike you. I went in the newsline sextion (NEWS, not COLUMNS/OPINIONS) and got the first three quotes that said anything about why Austin wasn't showing up at his job. They ALL said "from our sources" and none of it was opinion, so as I said before, AS FAR AS WE KNOW Austin is only mad because of HIS position.
Dave Scherer agreed with Austin, good for Dave Scherer. Just because 1wrestling people have opinions doesn't mean they're right. Now I know exactly what you're gonna do now, tell me that I'm a hipocrat because I quoted them as "facts." There's a difference between telling facts (or as close as facts that we can know) from their sources than their opinions.
"I'll even give you that Austin is out for himself"
That's not what you were saying before, even earlier in your same post. This is what my argument was, so thank you for finally ending this argument. Bottom line, as we both agreed now: Steve Austin is doing this for HIMSELF.
And where you ever saw me comparing Jarret to Austin I have no clue, but don't pretend I say things for your convenience. You don't have to be as good as Steve Austin is to be a main eventer.
Now, I realize that I have a bias for nWo, but after this argument, there's no question that your bias for anything going against nWo is far greater.
And one last thing, Hall, Nash, and Hogan DID lead WCW to new heights, and anyone other than you can see that.
__________________
|
Threaded Mode
