An Editorial By Cyrax9: Why Older is Better.

[Happydude]

i could find plenty of fun "modern" games...they just get boring fast...WC3 is really annoying, it gets old really fast cause it hardly has any units to build...and there is a really small limit to how many you can build...Starcraft on the other hand might not have those big "Heroes" but has much more of an army, and you can build way more.

as for Civ 3...i tried to play it....it's just waaaay to complicated, i havent played Civ 1 though, so maybe i just don't know how

i wanna try MOH: AA...but i got no $$$

and i don't think i've ever heard of age of mythology

[Ice Gecko]

Civ 3 is a pretty easy game by most standards of todays games that compete with it. I mastered it in 3 days just play the tutorial, read gamefaqs, read the 300+ page manual, and play, make mistakes, play more, win. Civ 1 is an impressive piece for its age though. AoE was just too hard for me i mean multiple troops that u can't control more tehn 25 at a time in a REAL time strategy! I can't wait to get civ3 play the world. And when i got civ 3 i got lotsa goodies a tech tree printout laminated, keyboard explanation, movie of the making, game.

[Happydude]

uh...huh


i'll play some old fasion StarCraft, Diablo 2, and Counter-Strike for now...