Does this look real to you?

[Neo]

http://www.mosnews.com/news/2006/01/...darkness.shtml

[MuGen]

With the way things are, it looks legit to me. Although I wouldn't call that complete invisibility but I'd call it a beta Cloak of Transparency.

My vote is that it's real... but it's still not as good as it needs to be (it's translucency I mean)

[Professor S]

Nope. Fake. Mainly because it was reported by "Interfax news".

[Neo]

It doesn't make sense to me. Bending light is one thing, but to control the angles so that you are seeing what is directly behind the object seems impossibly complicated.

[MuGen]

We fear what we don't understand.... or in some cases don't believe. You never know where the world is going these days. I mean... just a year ago they discovered in Japan the PlayStation 3.... I mean... come on..







LOL jk.

[Neo]

Originally Posted by MuGen

We fear what we don't understand.... or in some cases don't believe. You never know where the world is going these days. I mean... just a year ago they discovered in Japan the PlayStation 3.... I mean... come on..







LOL jk.

The PS3's will dissappear from the shelves, literally!

[GameMaster]

Are you talking about the picture? If so, I say, "No." The article states that only static objects can be made invisible at this time.

It could be plausible, but as I scrolled down and read some of the older headlines, my scepticism increased.

[Teuthida]

Wonder if it's anything like like http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/2777111.stm which was more of a camera trick.