PC Help

[Professor S]

Guys, I just picked up a new PC which is being delivered at the end of this week. I thought you might be able to give me a good gaming ability review.

1) Processor: 2.4 Gig Pentium 4
2) Memory: 256 mb RDRAM (Ram-Bus Technology) - 2X faster than DDR
3) 19" Trinitron Performance Flat Screen Monitor with .24 dot pitch

Thats all pretty good. Here's my worry...

3) eVGA GeForce 4 64MB MX with TV Out

This didn't get that great of reviews, but I couldn't afford the next step up and this came standard with the 8250 Dell Dimension. My worry is not being able to play any new games in a year or 2, and what about now? Are there games I can't play now because of the card?

Thanks for you help in advance.

[manasecret]

You'll be able to play all of the games out now with pretty good graphics, but some of the FPS's might run slow. However, the games in the near future may pose problems, especially games like Doom 3.

It depends on what you play really. Some will work really well while others won't, depends on how graphic intensive each one is. In general, though, you won't be able to play with the best settings on any recent game.

Fortunately, by spending just a little more money, you could get a very good videocard and another stick of 256 MB RDRAM. If you can't afford it now, wait for the next generation of GeForce to come out in January or February (or wait longer for the next ATI), and all the top cards of the market now will be really cheap.

Even now you can get a GeForce 4 Ti4600 for around $200 - $250 if you look at different websites. You can get the best card out now (ATI Radeon 9700) for about $330 if you look in the right places, but I'm guessing you don't want to spend that much.

So my advice in two steps:

1. First buy another stick of RDRAM before anything else (and make sure it's the same kind as you have now)

2. Then sometime down the road buy one of the best cards of the market now when they get much cheaper

Since you have a very good processor and RDRAM is the best to have, that's really all you need to be able to play the games coming out in the next year or two.

db (deed bleed)

[Professor S]

Thanks a lot. Excellent advice. I knew I would find someone who knew what they were talking about here.

meanwhile over at FXB someone told me that DDR was better than RD. I'm no computer wiz, but I know Rambus is much better than DDR.

[Shadow_Link]

Originally posted by The Strangler
meanwhile over at FXB someone told me that DDR was better than RD. I'm no computer wiz, but I know Rambus is much better than DDR.

It actually depends on what processor you have, so it really isn't as clear cut as that. Maybe things have changed, but I thought that DDR RAM went best with AMD Athlon XP's, and RD RAM went best with P4's, and also that the AMD setup was better.

[Professor S]

All I've heard about AMD Athlon's are that they aren't as good as the P4. My entire IT staff told me to go with the P4. Is there anything they don't know that you could tell me?

[manasecret]

Last time I researched, which was about a month ago, this is how it went in order of best:

1. Best P4 with PC1066 (fastest) RDRAM (expensive)
2. Second best P4 with PC1066 RDRAM
3. Third best P4 with PC1066 RDRAM
4. Best P4 with PC800 RDRAM
5. Second best P4 with PC800 RDRAM
6. Best Athlon with best DDR
7. Third best P4 with PC800 RDRAM
8. 2nd best Athlon with best DDR
9. Best P4 with best DDR
....

And so on. That's a generalization obviously, but that's pretty much how it was. Athlon doesn't use RDRAM at all, not sure why they don't I just know they don't have an option to use it.

I'm guessing the list is about the same now, but I couldn't tell you with out looking around a bit.

So in general, the best P4 with the best RDRAM will kick the pants out of the best Athlon, but the price difference is also monstrous. Of course then you could step down a rung or two of the P4's and still beat an Athlon for closer to the same price. Which is what I did.

db (dee bee)

[Shadow_Link]

Ah, I thought my information was a bit dated. A couple of months back, AMD with DDR RAM was top... Unless people were BS'ing .

I would go with Manasecret's advice. If you really want to get the best out of your games, you may want to start with upgrading your RAM. And if you've got enough cash after that, definately try getting a better GPU. Look into the 128MB cards. The best now now is the Radeon 9700. But I guarantee that in a short while, Nvidia will top it with something better. So wait till then, and the price of the current cards should drop a bit.

To get an intensive game like Doom 3 running at a decent rate, you may have to get a very good GPU. I don't even think the top ones at the moment will be able to run it at its optimum, but they will definately do a more than adequate job.

[Null]

RD ram is better then DDR, it does depend on the system. but in most cases a P4 with RD is better.

as for the chips. it used to be an AMD was better then a P4, however P4 kept getting faster while AMD didnt really keep up. So as for now, a higher speed P4 is better then an AMD.

as for the GFX card, that would should work for most stuff. might not display the higest graphics that the game can do in SOME cases.

right now id recommend a gf4 ti4600 128mb

However if that one is fine for you now. prolly the best thing would be to wait untill the NV30's come out (gf5's basically) thoes will be top of the line when they arrive.

or you could just wait untill a game comes along that you really need a new gfx card for.



Should get some games man. (cough Unreal Tournament 2003 cough)

we can play sometime.

[Professor S]

I'm not a huge FPS fan. I'm more into strategies and RPG's. I want the graphics so that I can be engrossed in the lush enironments. Plus I want to get Black and White and Warcraft 3.

[Null]

id say wait for the nv30's. if your going to try and get a good one, might as well get the best when they're new.


as for games. never heard of black and white.


but i'll kill you in warcraft3 if you like.

[Mushlafa]

Originally posted by Null


as for games. never heard of black and white.

Your jokin right????

[GameMaster]

Originally posted by Null
as for games. never heard of black and white.

Really? That's really strange. It was just one of the most highly praised games when it came out 2 years ago and it still stands as one of the greatest PC games ever. How could you have not heard of it?

[Null]

most likely cuz 2 years ago i didnt play very much computer games.

i think the only one i played was quake3

2 years ago i hated most computer games. refused to see them as being as good as they are.

didnt realize he was talking about an older game.

[manasecret]

Originally posted by The Strangler
I'm not a huge FPS fan. I'm more into strategies and RPG's. I want the graphics so that I can be engrossed in the lush enironments. Plus I want to get Black and White and Warcraft 3.

You'll be just fine with what you have now, then, unless by RPG you mean games like Morrowind (very graphic intensive).

If all you want is B&W and WC3, though, then you'll be absolutely fine for a long while.

I thought B&W sucked, by the way. It was ok until around the third level, which seemed impossible to beat. I thought the whole idea behind it was cool, but it had poor gameplay to back it up and a lot of the puzzles were impossible just because the controls made them impossible (which isn't challenging just frustrating).

If it's $20 I'd pick it up otherwise I wouldn't touch it. IGN gave it a 10 or nearly a 10 but then a little while later the guy who reviewed admitted later in the letters section or somewhere that he was caught by all the hype. After the hype died down, he realized that the game really isn't that fun.

db

[Happydude]

Originally posted by Null
never heard of black and white.

...





sorry...


*walks off chuckling*