I hate the terrorists

Crash · 06-23-2004, 12:45 PM

dunno if this is true or not, but here it is

[img]http://www.hosstyle.com/Goofy%20****/Goofy****41/images/blackjack_pershing.jpg[/img]

but after they executed the poor korean man, i think korea is going to kick some major ass. korea isn't all politically correct like the US is. they believe in retaliation, where if we do it, the liberals have a cow.

Dylflon · 06-23-2004, 01:00 PM

I believe the Korean man was their third beheading. This is escalating too quickly.

I do wonder though if people will be attacking the other terrorist states such as Iran, Sudan and Saudi Arabia.

Most of the 9/11 suicide pilots were Saudis. But the chances that they will be invaded is slim due to the fact that there is a lot of Saudi money in the American economy.

Jonbo298 · 06-23-2004, 01:43 PM

It would be interesting to get another Blackjack Pershing

Typhoid · 06-23-2004, 02:00 PM

I don't think its true, just judging by the website.

Yes, i am being judgmental.

Bond · 06-23-2004, 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dylflon

Most of the 9/11 suicide pilots were Saudis. But the chances that they will be invaded is slim due to the fact that there is a lot of Saudi money in the American economy.

1. The Saudis are incapable of running their own oil industry and require westerns to run it for them.

2. If Saudi Arabia was invaded and the House of Saud fell the single largest source of oil would be in turmoil and the world would be thrown into a depression. Why do you think our government is stocking up on oil reserves?

3. Even if we did invade Saudi Arabia, a bunch of civilians would die, and that would be tragic.

Dylflon · 06-23-2004, 03:07 PM

...I'm really not trying to argue with anyone.

I'm not for invading countries, I'm just interested is seeing if any of the other terrorist harbouring countries will be invaded.

Professor S · 06-23-2004, 05:51 PM

I think the theory that the Bush administration is running on is that by using Iraq as an example, they were the most powerful arab nation after all, they will eventually gain compliance. It kind of worked with Lybia, until Khaddafi (sp?) was exposed to have actually helped fund assassination attempts on the Saudi Royal family.

Speaking of the Saudi's, its only recently that Saudi Arabia has given amnesty to terrorists. Exactly why they would choose now to do so, well I have no idea.

Myself, I'm going to hold off all judgements on how this entire senario was handled for another year and see how the turnover of the governement goes. That afterall, will be the true test of whether or not this whole grand idea was even worth it.

On a side note, some good news coming out of Iraq:

5,000 new small and large Iraqi owned businesses have registered in Iraq since April of last year*

The unemployment rate has dropped from over 70% to under 25% in the past year. While thats not great for American standards, its pretty damn good for a country that was just overthrown and occupied.*

*These numbers are from the mouth of the Head of Economic Development in Iraq. Let the doubt and paranoid conspiracy theories begin...

bobcat · 06-23-2004, 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dylflon

...I'm really not trying to argue with anyone.

I'm not for invading countries, I'm just interested is seeing if any of the other terrorist harbouring countries will be invaded.

don't lie. You've been arguing with me since day 1. I know your evil plot

......

Crash · 06-23-2004, 07:20 PM

no one has invaded australia ina while, maybe we should do that first.

Typhoid · 06-23-2004, 09:07 PM

I think America invaded Canada a while back, stayed for it lasted for 3 days then they all left. Maybe they dropped by to have a decent beer?

I think it was called the war of the long weekend.

Dylflon · 06-23-2004, 09:23 PM

And let's not forget the war of 1812 when Canada invaded America and burned down the White House. At that point the Canadians got bored, went home and got drunk.

Typhoid · 06-23-2004, 09:29 PM

Canada is the reason the white house is white. If Canada never burnt it down, there would have been no need to paint it white, so it would be called "The House"

( And dont forget when the Canadians came home they played hockey put on their lumberjack outfits, cut wood, then slept in their igloos)

Joeiss · 06-23-2004, 10:46 PM

It was actually mainly English soldiers who burnt it down, with the help from some Canadian volunteers..

Crash · 06-24-2004, 02:41 AM

hmmm.... we should burn down the prime ministers place... just for the fun of seeing what color it'd be next.

Typhoid · 06-24-2004, 02:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crash

hmmm.... we should burn down the prime ministers place... just for the fun of seeing what color it'd be next.

LOL, thats the most scientific thing i've ever heard it referred to as. " The Prime Ministers place." it does have a classy kind of ring to it.