Re: Supreme Court Rules in Favor of "Indefinite Imprisonment"
I agree with it to an extent..I guess. Especially if it's a child sex offender.
However holding someone after their release date that had been decided seems so very wrong, especially for sex offense and not something like murder. I understand it's the whole "This person isn't rehabilitated" stance, and agree that's a good reason to keep someone in. However it could also prove to keep rehabilitated people in jail just because a handful of dudes don't think he's okay, which is almost like false imprisonment, so long as his time is up.
The judge and courts decide on X years for a sex offender, and after that X years can just say "Nah, kidding, you're staying here for a while. We'll tell you when you can go."
I say all or nothing. Either they should be able to hold every person in jail longer than their sentence, or nobody.
But if it's for anything, I definitely think it should be enacted for murder, because I don't think 'the system' is hard enough on people who kill people.
__________________
Fingerbang:
1.) The sexual act where a finger is inserted into the vagina or anus.
Headbang:
1.) To vigorously nod your head up and down.
|