Thread: Over/Under: U2
View Single Post

Over/Under: U2
Old 05-10-2010, 07:42 PM   #1
KillerGremlin
No Pants
 
KillerGremlin's Avatar
 
KillerGremlin is offline
Location: Friggin In The Riggin
Now Playing: my ding-a-ling
Posts: 4,566
Default Over/Under: U2

Quote:
To clarify:

Over = the band is overrated by today's standards, for whatever reason you want to argue/defend.

Under = the band is underrated by today's standard, for whatever reason you want to argue/defend.
Okay, moving onwards....

Unos, dos, tres, catorce!


Many people may know U2 for this:


So okay, Bono is a douche bag. He is an international douche bag. And he is full of shit. Or he is shit. Either way, Bono is not good. But aside from Bono's environmental posturing, he actually is able to sing. At least in my opinion.

One day, many many years ago, U2 made albums like The Joshua Tree, Boy, and October. Like a lot of 80s bands, U2 kind of fell off during the 90s.

U2 is known for their live shows and they are definitely a stadium rock band. They've influenced bands like Muse, The Killers, Coldplay and Radiohead. There is no denying that Bono's shit...or wait, isn't he a shit?...is contagious.

Anyway, discuss.
  Reply With Quote