:eek:
Xantar, how is it your right to say that I am a graphics whore just because I find N-Gage to be more appealing to me than GBA? I said that if it wasn't for the price it would be no worse than GBA as an overall product not just as a game system. I also used THPS as an example of how the graphics can affect the gameplay. So what is your point? As far as I know you have none.
I don't have to be a graphics whore to pick a game with better graphics over the same game with worse graphics, no matter what score it got. For example, THPS1 on Dreamcast got a better score than THPS4 on Xbox, does it make me a graphics whore to go out and pick it up over THPS1? No.
At IGN Sonic Adventure got an 8.6 from IGN, and Sonic Adventure 2 got a 9.4 on Dreamcast. On Gamecube the same games with more features got a 5.0 and 6.9. Would that make me a graphics whore to pick up the Gamecube version of the game over the Dreamcast version? Hell no. So why should I trust reviews of any games that were ported?
I own a GBA and I know it sucks, and I know that it was a waste of money. I don't trust reviews, and from videos, screenshots, and previews I have read, I find N-Gage's games and the hardware itself to be more appealing. Why does that bother you so much? I look at THPS and I see a game that looks more appealing then anything I have played on GBA. Based off of graphics? Yes.
You compare.
GBA:
N-Gage:
Ps2 (one of my fav games)
This by far is the most tempting handheld game I have ever seen, but I'm a graphics whore because it looks like it plays better (more like the full version)? You have issues man
