View Single Post

Re: WrestleMania XIX vs Raw 2: Ruthless Agression vs SmackDown 5: Here Comes the Pain
Old 07-09-2003, 06:25 PM   #8
nWoCHRISnWo
Mr. Perfect
 
nWoCHRISnWo's Avatar
 
nWoCHRISnWo is offline
Location: City of Champions, Edmonton...Alberta...Canada
Now Playing:
Posts: 739
Default Re: WrestleMania XIX vs Raw 2: Ruthless Agression vs SmackDown 5: Here Comes the Pain

Quote:
Originally Posted by Perfect Stu
To be honest, I'm not informed of all the modes and features in either RAW 2 or WMXIX, but I don't know how you can go wrong with SD!'s features:

-Most up-to-date rosters
-LEGENDS!!!
-Most number of match types (Elimination Chamber!)
-WWE writer-scripted storylines
-Superstar Voiceovers
Well in my opinion, none of these matter too much. All the games will have a pretty up to date roster, but it doesn't matter because they'll all be out of date soon after they're released anyways. Legends is the one thing that makes me wanna get SD 5. WWE wrtier-scripted storylines... Umm quite frankly I don't know how you can go RIGHT with that feature. I don't really care about the voiceovers, so that leaves the match types. While SD will have the most, it doesn't necessarily mean better. It has Elimination Chamber, but who really cares? Odds are it'll suck, it was only used once in WWE and the match wasn't that great, they probably won't use it again much if ever, and I just don't feel the need to have an Elimination Chamber match. I can't say which has the best features until I actually try them. I'd hate to bring up No Mercy AGAIN, but I live the features in No Mercy better than in any other WWF/E wrestling game so far. It didn't have the most, but what it did have I liked a lot. No other ladder match is even have as fun as the one in No Mercy, I don't like any of the cage matches in any games, Hell in a Cell (in any game) is only fun for the first time or so, table matches suck, etc.

So if you didn't read all that crap, all I'm saying is most features will probably suck anyway so I gotta try them before deciding.
__________________
  Reply With Quote