Quote:
Originally posted by Mushlafa
I dunno how a game gets such a good score with so many downsides  The game is too easy... thats a bad thing.. ontop of that its not long enough and the reason its even as long as it is, is because the fetch quests could add like 2 hours to it.. and the part of OoT i like most was the dungeons and there isnt even that many of them..
I dunno but im actually pretty worried about this game now... I was hoping for it to be a 40 hour game filled with dungeons and fun quests... not tedious fetch quests... thats not fun....
|
Agreed. Matt doesn't seem to emphasize the problems enough.
dramatization:
Hugo's Giant Adventure is an AMAZING game...blah, blah, blah...another great addition to the Hugo series...blah, blahdownsides include horrible framerate, tedious gameplay and an impossible learning curve...but pay no attention to the small print...I mean, who does?
/dramatization
I like a game that is challenging (best idea would be to give the user an option of easy, normal and hard) and I like a game that never bores me. Unfortunately those games aren't very common, and in WW's case it may not be that bad...but a 9.6 is damned near perfection...I'm thinking that his overall score was a bit generous if anything