View Single Post

Old 02-26-2003, 09:52 AM   #32
Jonbo298
Freaky me Freaky you
 
Jonbo298's Avatar
 
Jonbo298 is offline
Location: In the Cornfields of Iowa
Now Playing:
Posts: 8,082
Default

I have to wonder if people think Nintendo doesn't know how to make a game. A lot of people are "weaned" on the PS(2) and think that when they see a 'Cube game from Nintendo like Mario, they think it sucks because its not what it "should" be. If Nintendo just took the original Super Mario Bros. on the NES and out it in 3D with nothing else new, people would bitch and moan on how its just Super Mario Bros. with a new coat of paint. Sound familiar? SM64/SMS Now it seems that people don't take anything from Nintendo as good anymore just because Nintendo takes a familiar character and gives him a fresh new look in a fresh new environment. Isn't this what most people want? People don't seem to want that. They just find anything to bitch and moan about from Nintendo and blow it out of proportion. I liked SMS, it was good. Luigi's Mansion was good, but it was too short and offered really no replay value. A rental was good enough for me. I liked SFA because it was similar to Zelda, with the exception that Fox was walking:eek: instead of flying. But people bitch that its not a "Traditional" Star Fox game. There have been only 2 SF games and people already think its the only way to play SF. I bet when the new SF comes out from Namco, people will find something to bitch about. Kind of like the new Zelda. People want a realistic one, but when they dont get it, they say it sucks. There is more then just what meets the eye. But to the casual gamer, looks are everything. (Just like real life:eek: ) But this is just my rant, and with all rants from me, people will blow it out. meh
__________________

Credit to Null for sig

  Reply With Quote