Quote:
Originally posted by BreakABone
And to Justin, a point I forgot to make earlier when I was replying to your lenght of a title reign. Well, you also forgot to take into account the meaning of the title. The WWF has historical significances as does the WCW title, but Triple H doesn't holdthe WVW title, he may have the belt, but basically it was a belt given to him and since he got it, he has pretty much had it since it's creation.
|
Thank you for admiting you are wrong and that his title run was only a month and a half
Quote:
The belt had been around something like 5 months and he has held it 4 months and the only reason I think he even let HBK win it was to get it back from him later on to make himself look that much better.
|
Well, what was H supposed to do?
1) He has control over the story lines, control that he shouldn't have.
2) Who else was a big contender for the World title on Raw when H lost it?
Triple H is like how Austin was in 98-2001... either had the belt, or was a top contender for it. It has got to the point where it doesn't make sense for HHH not to be in the title hunt over 95% of the guys in the WWE... and it's not his fault.
I think this little clique thing will work out so he can lose the title, not be a contender for it, and still be a big part of the story line. Vince let it get too far out of hand for HHH to fall back into the darkness. HHH is like a version of The Rock who is always around... maybe they need to start doing the ol fake WCW injuries and just have him wrestle 6 months per year or somthing.