Quote:
Originally posted by TheGame
You guys expect too much from the WWE...
World title history:
Triple H had the belt 2 months, gave it to michaels for a month, now HHH is back up to having it 1 1/2 months... how quick does he really need to lose the damn belt?
WWE title history:
Angle had it for a month and a half, Big Show had it for a month, Brock carried the belt for 3 months, Rock had it a month, Hulk had it a month, HHH had it a month, Jericho for 3 months, Austin had it 2 months, Angle had it one month, Austin had it 6 months, Rock had it two months and Angle had it 4 months.
This dates back to late 2000 (aka the first champion of 2001)
Why compared to Austin's 6 month run, Brocks 3 month run, Jericho's 3 month run, and Angle's 4 month run is HHH's 1.5 month run special?
Hell, HHH is one of the very few big superstar wrestlers to lose to Hogan... if he's the selfish SOB you guys clame he is, why would he lose to the older, slower, and definently less ring talented Hogan? Rock sure didn't lose, and Austin didn't stay around long enough to lose... Undertaker didn't lose... but who did? Who gave hogan his last run?
HHH shouldn't be fired, and he sure as hell doesn't need to give up the belt. When he has a 6 month Austin run with the belt, or 6 month Goldberg run with the belt, then start talking about who should be fired or who should give up the belt.
|
Well first off Triple H's first "World Title" run on Raw is closer to 3 months since he got it after SummerSlam and lost it at Survivor Series.
The difference between Austin's 6 month reign, Jericho's 3 month reign and Brock's 3 month reign is rather simple, they were built as proper heels. I mean in any of those titles defenses it seemed like the match could go either way and for the most part, the Champion probably barely squeaked by with the belt.
Also to compare Austin's 6 month reign is a bit difficult because for about 1-1/2 months the story was really focused on the InVasion angle, he just happened to have the belt at the time. Also if you go back and watch basically any match from that title reign Austin never went over cleanly as easily as Triple H did. I mean in theory Austin lost the title at KOTR because he tapped out to both Benoit and Jericho and he lost it to Angle at SummerSlam, but Angle was screwed. That makes for interesting TV when you know that the face has a chance of coming back and beating the heel.
The same applies to Jericho's title reign, well until the whole WrestleMania feud begun where he was made to look like Stephanie's bi@tch, hmm wonder who his oppenet was.
Hhaha, I can't believe you are congratulating Triple H for putting over Hogan (which BTW he got even with if you don't remember so it was a little take and give), I mean I respect Hogan and all but most of Hogan's tenure in the WWE should have been used to put over people like the Rock, Kurt Angle, Edge and Brock Lesnar like he did, I don't think Hogan beating Triple H really did much for either man career, and if Triple H can lose to Hogan, why can't he lose to someone a bit more agile like RVD or a star in the making like Booker T?