[TheGame]

Have you guys ever stopped to think that HHH is getting built up for a big fall???

It's seems all of you agree that instead of wondering if he will win a match, you are wondering when he will win a match... Which brings me to a thought... if HHH were to lose his title wouldn't be a much bigger suprise than if Kurt were to lose his?

WWE seems to be taking both the angle of having a dominant champion who is invinceable and having a champion who can barely hold his belt at the same time. Do they really need to do the same for both shows?

Before I could ever blame HHH for anything, I would blame whoever is writing... and I would really put the blame on whoever decided that it was a bright idea to split up the shows...

HHH wasn't the one who sat there, slapped vince, and told him to split the shows and make himself a champ on one of the shows. HHH doesn't own the WWE, so if he had anything to do with himself keeping the belt it's still not his fault... it's whoever gave him this freedom's fault.

Triple H is a poison in his state, and WWE giving him so much freedom is the reason for it. I am pretty sure vince knows this, and as much as I hate him I know he is not an idiot.

I expect HHH to win at the next PPV... as do I expect Angle to win at the next PPV. It's all about momentum coming into WM. Then at WM, there will be a clear and present chance of them both handing thier belts... and I say there is a bigger chance of H giving it up.

I'm not just saying this because he is my fav wrestler, it's just a fact. On a game like No Mercy, you didn't want to lose to your friends because you probably had a big ego and you were in 100% control of the situation... so how the hell do you guys expect the story-line creator version of H to give up the belt?

What they need to do is kick him out of the office, and make him a slave to what the writers tell him to do (on Raw that's not really a good thing, but eh, it's a start). Once ego gets in the way of a wrestler's choice to win or lose a match, it starts trouble... as we learned with Mr. Bret Hart and even Austin who was whining about not being in the spot-light at WMx8.

You guys expect too much from the WWE...

World title history:
Triple H had the belt 2 months, gave it to michaels for a month, now HHH is back up to having it 1 1/2 months... how quick does he really need to lose the damn belt?

WWE title history:
Angle had it for a month and a half, Big Show had it for a month, Brock carried the belt for 3 months, Rock had it a month, Hulk had it a month, HHH had it a month, Jericho for 3 months, Austin had it 2 months, Angle had it one month, Austin had it 6 months, Rock had it two months and Angle had it 4 months.

This dates back to late 2000 (aka the first champion of 2001)

Why compared to Austin's 6 month run, Brocks 3 month run, Jericho's 3 month run, and Angle's 4 month run is HHH's 1.5 month run special?

Hell, HHH is one of the very few big superstar wrestlers to lose to Hogan... if he's the selfish SOB you guys clame he is, why would he lose to the older, slower, and definently less ring talented Hogan? Rock sure didn't lose, and Austin didn't stay around long enough to lose... Undertaker didn't lose... but who did? Who gave hogan his last run?

HHH shouldn't be fired, and he sure as hell doesn't need to give up the belt. When he has a 6 month Austin run with the belt, or 6 month Goldberg run with the belt, then start talking about who should be fired or who should give up the belt.