[BreakABone]

Originally posted by TheGame
Nice questions, I wonder where you got them???

Act like you don't know you are the cause of all these questions!

Maybe... define "preforming well"

I will not define it, this is why the invited dictionaries.

Yes and Yes... I feel it would be better if any wrestler went to SD.

I think this is the iggest piece of bull, I've ever read, and I read quite a few pieces of bull. The fact of the matter is Triple H IMO could and would only hurt the SmackDown brand.

The fact of the matter is Triple H needs to be in the spotlight in his own eyes, on SmackDown there is no room for him to be in the spotlight between Hogan,Angle,Benoit, Lesnar, Show, Taker, Edge, Guerroros, Cena, Matt Hardy and some other folks SmackDown is rather full on all levels and is well balanced.

And as many people should know Triple H doesn't want to work with people or things he feel is beneath him, hence the fact that there is no more IC title.

Who knows? Does he write the story lines?

Nope Eric Bischoff doesn't write the stories, he is an on-air character much like the wrestlers without much say as to where his character is going.

[quote[I think Raw's failure is because:
1) On monday night, it has much more competition from high rated television programs.[/quote]
SmackDown is also against some stiff compeitton like Survivor and Friends which generally rank as some high rated shows. And the fact of the matter is Raw has always had stiff competition has never stopped it before if anything Raw has less competition with only one Monday Nightr wrestling show now.

2) The Talent pool simply isn't as good as Smackdown's. (it's getting there though)

Raw does have a quite good roster of Superstars, they just aren't used properly,it's not the wrestler's fault, you can blmae the writing staff and Triple H for that one.

3) The world championship race isn't as interestiong to watch... with all the big players like say... The Rock, Brock Lensar, Big Show, Kurt Angle, and Undertaker basically being locked on SD it's kinda hard to find a guy who it makes sense for HHH to even have a rivalry with. Don't get me wrong, Steiner, HBK, Booker T, Jericho, and RVD aren't horrible... but they havent worked themselves to invincability like HHH.

The World Championship on SmackDown is easier to watch because the title means something, the Raw title for the most part is a Trophy for Triple H. I mean I find it pretty pathetic when the women's title has more meaning on a wrestling show than any other title. I mean the Tag Titles on Raw and the World Title on Raw are absolute jokes IMO.

the SmackDown World title has been without The Rock and Undertaker in the picue for some time now, and the Big Show is a joke. Why is it that Kurt Angle could fight someone on SmackDown and the match means something, the SmackDown title means something almost every time you see it whether on TV or a PPV, the Raw title doesn't have as much power. I mean how often if ever do people feel like their is a chance of Triple H losing it?

There is Stienter... the guy who worked himself up to champion over a sluggish WCW

Steiner main problem now is that he sucks as a face and he sucks even worse in a match, it's that simple, he get himself in shape or he is shipped out.

There is HBK, known for screwing Bret Hart, and also a champion in the dark age of WWE

HBK may be known for that but as his feud with Chris Jericho is proving, he has a lot of worth to the company and could actually build up younger talent to replace him, now if certain other folks did that...

There is Booker T, the tag member of the freakyest guy in the WWE... Booker T became a joke in the WWE before he could even make a huge impact.

you are right, the WWE screwed up big-time on Booker T, I mean he came in and made a big impact by attacking Austin, do they follow up on that storyline? Hell no. Then he is made to look weak by losing his belt to Angle after interference from like everyone and their mother just to win it back and lose it to the Rock some 3 wks later. Is it too late for the WWE to do something with Booker T? I don't think so, he is still loved by the crowd if they could just work it right.

Jericho, the first undisputed Champion... the guy who won by cheating, and then got his ass kicked by HHH at WMx8. He has also been and still is a joke.

Jericho is a heel, he has been a heel for well over a year. Jericho knows how to be a proper heel. A heel isn't supposed to go over easily on everyone, that's the whole point of being a bad guy, you sometimes cheat and it makes for interesting TV as it gives the good guy a way of looking like he could beat the bad guy if it was fair. You are right Jericho is a joke and that is only because Triple H for the most part is jealous of him. Jericho got the charisma, the mic skills and the wrestling ability to be one of the best damn wrestlers in history and I'm sure Triple H knows it, that is why he tries to bury Jericho as much as possible. I mean the Jericho/Triple H feud probably had one of the worst build ups in WrestleMania history and one of the least rememebered mainevent match in WrestleMania history. It is truly sad, but atleast it looks like HBK is gonna right that wrong.

Then there is RVD, deserving of a big break, but his fighting style is akward for world championship material... he is more of a "big" cruiserweight

I think it's rather nice to have someone with a different fighting style in the main event scene, I mean it's pretty pathetic when everyone shares arsenals which they do seem to share, and as for him being a "big" crusierweight, yes he is agile, but so was HBK and he is probably one of the best World Champions of all-time.

on to Smackdown...

There is The Rock, even when he first started in the WWE he was hated but he didn't suck. After he turned bad... joined the Nation of Domination, then the Corperation, he has never become a joke. The man is nearly invinceable, and at a PPV it's rarely easy to imagine him loseing. (cept when he fights Austin )

The Rock was not hated when he first came into the WWF, he was a joke. The "blue-chipper" was a lame ass gimmick and he was pushed to the stars for no apparent reason. The fans dind't like that and turned their backs on him, and that was probably the biggest break in his career EVER, if not for that who knows what would have become of his career. The Rock has lost at so many PPV it's not even funny, I mean he has lost to Jericho, Triple H, Austin, Kurt Angle, Brock Lesnar and so many more on PPV, it's cool though. People don't need to seem like Superman in order to be popular. I have my issues with the Rock, but he is one of the few Superstars who is comfortable with his position and has no problem putting over younger talent. Just ask Brock Lesnar or Kurt Angle or even Chris Jericho.

There is Brock lensar, never really showing a weakness in his carrer, his first title match he beats The Rock at a PPV fairly. This guy is meant for superstardom.

There is an interesting article over at 411wrestling.com that I think you should read in relation to Brock Lesnar, the fact of the matter is Brock Lesnar only became a star because people in the company were eager to help put him over. People like Triple H? No, more like Hulk Hogan, The Rock and the Undertaker. The fact of the matter is you can't become a mega star without another star helping you on your path, something Triple H is unwilling to do.

There is Big Show, at one big chunk of his carrer he had become a joke. As it stands, he is not anymore. He has allways been a great person to see at a love show because of his size, and everybody knows he has the potiental to become the champ.

Do me a favor, never mention Big Show again if you want to be taken seriously. The guy has been a joke for most of his tenure in the WWF.

Kurt Angle, Joke? Yes... but that's because Austin damn near killed his carrer. That "You suck, what?" chant has been following him far too long. But if we look at the past, he has had big rivalries with the big three on WWE, Austin, Rock, and HHH... he is also fresh talent and is a deserving champ.

Kurt Angle IMO was never a joke and still this day isn't a joke. Kurt Angle will go down in the history books as one of the best ever and probably the best America wrestler of all-time. I mean Kurt Angle has the full package, he could wrestle, not only can he wrestle but he can carry his own and his oppenents own in the ring which is the mark of a true athelete. you see the chants of "You Suck" and "What?" those are what we call good things in wrestling. It means the fans are reacting to him and he is doing his job right, it is much better than just being "booed".

Then there's UNdertaker. What more need I say? He has always been at the top of the hill, or at least near the top. Probably the runner up for Raw's wrestler of the decade.

I'm sure Taker has earned the respect of many and there ins't much to say on him.

(and then there is still Hullk and Booker T)

I would just like to say, I will find it hard to take anything you say about wrestling serious again if you mentioned Big Show as an important assest to SmackDown, but left out the roster that actually makes the show interesting like Benoit, Edge, Team Angle, Los Guerroros, John Cena and Version 1 even if a short paragraph for all.

Challenged, yes, by his equals? No.

I think the reason Triple H has no "equals" as you say is because he doesn't give anyone the chance to rise to that level. I mean I'm sure of some of Raw's talent was on SmackDown they would be major players on the show. Just take a look at Chris Benoit and Eddie Guerorro who both left Raw in the summer and how important they have become to SmackDown's success or even Brock Lesnar.

Nope, I think he should lose the belt any get traded away... or sombody with more ring talent than stiener needs to fight him. But he has beat all of his competition from Raw... so maybe it's time to trade and get some more guys for him to beat up on

In time, hopfully Raw could become the comeback home to The Rock and/or Austin.

I think as a World Champion, one skill that needs to be vital in holding onto the belt is the ability to carry anyone on the roster to a watchable match, and I really don't think that Steiner crap cut it. I'm pretty sure Triple H has it in him, I mean he had remarkable matches with Taka and the Brooklyn Brawler in 2000, the problem is Triple H is a shell of a wrestler he used to be and there is no way to change that unless he improves himself, not the talent aroundhim. A piece of sh!t in New York is a piece of sh!t in Texas.