Quote:
Originally posted by Joeiss
Comparing Hitler and Hussein is a joke. Please do not every make that comparison again.
|
Oh, I'm sorry... I was completely wrong. Saddam has the potential to be worse than Hitler.
Of course, Saddam is nothing like Hitler as of now. But, was not Hitler also seen as a reliable leader before his large plans of racial extermination? Hitler was one of the most charismatic men of the world's history. Why, he was even a spokesperson for the Olympics, and the first voice on radio which extended past Earth's limits. Hitler's "goal" was quite noble in his mind.
What makes Saddam so different? Is it because he hasn't hurt you or anyone you know? Is it because you haven't read about him attempting to wipe out an entire race?
*shrugs* Well, let's see. Let all the world leave Saddam to his plans. Perhaps he won't turn out to be anything like Hitler. Maybe he's just performing his "experiments" not to test out the power of his weaponry, but rather to discover some peculiar cure to cancer!
Quote:
|
Yea, i agree with this one, Umm, Saddam, is just....a dictator, who has a reputation of being a "terrorist" Hitler, began to wipe out an entire race of people without thinking twice.
|
Ooooh boy... "just a dictator". I suppose Hitler's start was that dramatically different. As well, I presume being highlighted as a "terrorist" isn't too bad as being highlighted as a "military and political genius".
It's not what Saddam has done. It's what Saddam can do. And... inspecting palaces isn't going to give anybody the heads up.
Personally, I believe the word "terrorist" has been far over-used by the press. Heh, they should try "alarmist" or "horrorist" *gasps*.