Quote:
Originally posted by UncleNoName
In your opinion. These awards were the opinions of the people at GameSpot, and I agree with SMS getting Most Disappointing Game. The game really, really let me down. Yes, it was a good game, but it wasn't up to the standards of the other Mario games. It just didn't stand out like the other Marios, that's why it was a big disappointment...
|
So let's say SMS wasn't a Mario game. Let's say it was a different character with a different title.
So it would get a better rating and it wouldn't be the "most disappointing" game for the Gamecube? If it does, then that's just plain stupid.
Quote:
Originally posted by Jason1
I can see why they found Sunshine to be dissapointing. I was somewhat dissapointed. I mean, compared to the revolutionary jumps other Mario games made, why shouldnt we expect this one to do the same? Dissapointing graphics, dissapointing ending. SFA, on the other hand, had uber cool graphics, and one hell of an ending IMO. Didnt dissapoint me.
|
Graphics...? Oh, not this again. So you chose graphics over gameplay? I sure don't. Wow, SFA had a little better graphics. Sure, the SMS ending sucked...But what Mario ending didn't suck? Hell, even Mario RPG's ending sucked! Also, I thought SFA ending was the gayest thing I've ever seen in my life. Seriously, I mean, the Falco part was awesome, but the rest...? You aren't even able to go back and mess around... What I mean is, the game has NO replay value. Thus, Mario has lots of replay. The gameplay in Mario wins over SFA's gameplay. It's obvious, Gamespot's not that great of a reviewer... I am aware it's all opinion but what the hell kind of opinion is that!?
I'm sorry, but I just hate Gamespot. I hated them ever since they reviewed one of my favorite games of all time back in 1998,
Tales of Destiny for the Playstation.