Quote:
Originally posted by GameKinG
Well, rare was a pretty good dev, and it will be interesting to see what they do without nintendo (for all I care, I hope they fail, just sour grapes).
I also hope nintendo claims:
DK
SF
PD
BK
CBF
etc. under their name...I dont know how or why they would want to, but it seems fair to me, considering Ill never own a microsoft game system (likely).
Ysy for Nintendo's over-powering lawyers!
Meh, Id like rare more, but they release games slower then nintendo, even though some of it may be due to nintendo.
|
every character or game license that ninteno owned before rare is defently thiers... aka DK, SF. other games that rare published under nintendos name would have to be bought from nintendo... aka pd, bk conker.. etc.
at least thats how i understood it from IGN.
and as for that last post.... nintendo denies it?
or they just deny selling thier shares in it? which would mean MS would own some or most shares and nintendo owns the other 30 something percent?
hmmm. something fishie. There was something said on Planetgamecube that they suspect that Nintendo still would have a Contract with rare that not even MS could break. not sure what that would mean either tho