Quote:
Originally Posted by Vampyr
Same here. I mean, I don't want change for the sake of change. I want change I agree with.
It is sad that no progressive policies are going to go through and we are still going to be at the whim of reactionaries, though.
|
1) You got the change you agreed with in 2008
2) He passed exactly what he wanted for 2 years when he controlled government.
You have received what you asked for. But as I've often said when it comes progressive policy, the overriding reaction to failure tends to be "We just need to do it HARDER!"
At the very least we should get gridlock, and gridlock is much better than another Dodd-Frank or other interventionist policies that have frozen growth.