Quote:
Originally Posted by Dylflon
So yes, in some cases I will be willing to concede that I take little issue with laws about private space (concerning commercial areas, not a random person's home as you imply later in your post) when the issues at stake are about the basic rights and freedoms of a population being put second to the interests of corporations and financial institutions.
To imply that I support tyranny is a very childish jump in logic and a very weak way to try and invalidate my opinion.
|
So, the scenario you support begs two questions: who decides when it is acceptable to overrule laws? Who decides the definition of "basic rights and freedoms of a population?"
Quote:
They're occupying the space where those responsible for the destruction of thousands of lives reside.
|
Please explain.
Quote:
And people in power spend more time trying to convince everyone that protesters are lunatics or criminals than they do listening to what they have to say.
|
What are they saying? It seems as though we've agreed that the protesters do not have a concise or clear message, so how is one supposed to discern what they are saying in a coherent fashion?