Quote:
Originally Posted by KillerGremlin
Price collapse model? There is a theory to this insanity? The real problem is that games are way too much money out the gate and there are way too many games. The reality is developers need to either make less games so that people can afford them and have time to play them lol, but that will cost them money; or they can keep making tons of games and LOWER THE PRICES. This is exacerbated by this 3-console + PC gaming market where you often need to buy the hit games across 4 platforms. Total, insane, expensive, craziness.
|
Oh I completely agree that the game industry needs a more flexible pricing scheme.
There are games (VERY few I should state) that I think are worth the $60 admission fee and then there are games in which I think they have a much better chance of selling if they launched at 30-40 bucks.
The problem with that at times is perceived values, most people associate cheaper games with poorer qualities so they don't bat an eye at it or anything.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carnage17
i agree with people not having enough time to play them but how about an alternate model altogether: make games shorter, cheaper, and by extension cheaper and shorter to make... this is also smaller risk on the part of publishers.
|
But they are making shorter games, the two Gears of War, Splinter Cell Conviction, and I'm sure tons of other games don't even begin to hit double digits for completion. But we still pay full price for it, (I'm sure a case could and would be made for co-op/online extending the standard play-time)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Combine 017
I think Nintendo is already doing something like that... turns out they make a lot of crappy games.
|
Not the place for this conversation, but I'm just going to say you are wrong and leave it there.