Quote:
Originally Posted by Typhoid
Neat.
Back to the good 'ol Strangler days, I see.
It's a shame you don't actually answer anything directed at you, and only look for one thing to constantly jump on, negating everything else said of relevance.
|
Canadian statistics don't have anything to do with those situations and are therefore irrelevant to my query.
Typhoid, I answered everything of relevance. I asked those scenarios after a lot of thought and reflection after hearing what you and Dyflon had to say. I wanted to workout realistic scenarios that would help me make the best, moral decisions if the unthinkable should ever happen, and I honestly asked for your opinion on them. I already stated I was buying a gun, I wanted to be sure my plans to operate it were within reason. As for "that will never happen" I did address them, and in fact that was one of the reasons why I made my scenarios so specific.
As for the "move somewhere else" argument, well that is an argument from a point of affluence and not necessity. There are plenty of people who live in statistically dangerous areas that cannot move, and in fact I would say the majority of people who live in dangerous areas can't afford to move (why would they be there to begin with?). In fact, I am one of those people who can't afford to move. I'm upside down on my house right now due to market drop. I couldn't sell my house if I did live in a violent area (I don't, but I live next to a violent area).
But again, moving was never a part of those scenarios. They were located in any house, anywhere. My specificity was meant to prevent the irrelevant alternatives you insisted on offering.