View Single Post

Re: Nuclear Renaissance??
Old 02-17-2010, 03:30 PM   #3
manasecret
aka George Washington
 
manasecret's Avatar
 
manasecret is offline
Location: New Orleans, LA/Houston, TX
Now Playing: CSS
Posts: 2,670
Default Re: Nuclear Renaissance??

Yeah I just read about this. It reminds me of a Wired article on Thorium.


Uranium-Fueled Light-Water Reactor
Fuel Uranium fuel rods
Fuel input per gigawatt output 250 tons raw uranium
Annual fuel cost for 1-GW reactor $50-60 million
Coolant Water
Proliferation potential Medium
Footprint 200,000-300,000 square feet, surrounded by a low-density population zone

Seed-and-Blanket Reactor
Fuel Thorium oxide and uranium oxide rods
Fuel input per gigawatt output 4.6 tons raw thorium, 177 tons raw uranium
Annual fuel cost for 1-GW reactor $50-60 million
Coolant Water
Proliferation potential None
Footprint 200,000-300,000 square feet, surrounded by a low-density population zone

Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor
Fuel Thorium and uranium fluoride solution
Fuel input per gigawatt output 1 ton raw thorium
Annual fuel cost for 1-GW reactor $10,000 (estimated)
Coolant Self-regulating
Proliferation potential None
Footprint 2,000-3,000 square feet, with no need for a buffer zone




http://www.wired.com/magazine/2009/1...ew_nukes/all/1

And the upside is, thorium reactors are being made right now. In fact, they were first made some four decades ago. The only reason the U.S. went with uranium over thorium is because you need the enriched by-products of uranium reactors to create nuclear bombs, and the U.S. at the time was very interested in making such bombs.
__________________
d^_^b
  Reply With Quote