Quote:
Originally Posted by Bond
I think that comment was a little less than fair. I simply wanted to point out that Obama has not absolved the use of these tactics, but rather suspended their practice, with the possibility of reinstating them if he deems it necessary in the future.
|
He hasn't absolved them yet because nobody "high up" (Other than, you know - the U.N) has deemed these tactics to be torture yet. So if he is able to do these things in the future and get his scapegoats, why wouldn't he?
Not to mention it would be in relatively poor taste for a newly appointed President to jump right up and say "Yes, what my predecessor did was torture."
Just because Obama hasn't absolved it, doesn't mean it still isn't torture.
Hell, even if the US government decided it's not torture - that doesn't mean it's not torture.