Quote:
Originally Posted by Szymon
As long as the old man never harmed anyone and his under age "victims" agreed to the sex and enjoyed it then who the fuck are you to tell either of these people what to do? If this was some sort of vigilante sting operation (I don't know because the article link didn't work) then it could very well be that the 16 year old kid contacted our sexual predator and offered the sex, in which case the only predator would be the murderer.
Sure it's weird for the old guy to have a taste for adolescent boys but does that justify murder? If you're truly against it and want to perform some sort of vigilante justice then take something precious from the guy like a couple of fingers or his dick, but as somebody who values their own life beyond anything else, I would never take that away from somebody else.
If the title of this article was Murder or Rape, that might be a different story. A rapist pedophile is a horrible person doing a horrible thing. However this man was not a pedophile, he was an ephebophile, which I can say I am too. Probably because that adolescent age range is only 1 year younger than me. And yea it's weird that he was paying for the sex, but that's not even illegal unless he was the person contacting random people money for sex (soliciting).
I am only 20 so for me to fuck a 16 year old would be weird, but not THAT weird. To pay for it would be even weirder, but not THAT weird. And for me to be 50 and do those things, well it would be THAT weird but not fucked up enough to justify a murder. Throw in the fact that he's gay and suddenly you have yourself a whole new level of hate, a level that shouldn't even exist but it does due to the insecurities and misunderstandings of the ignorant gay hating fucks out there.
In conclusion I'd fuck a 16 year old girl for $60 and it would be weird, but for an old man to fuck a 16 year old guy for $60 is enough to justify murder for some reason. If you plan on responding with "You'll understand when you get older." then you probably shouldn't respond at all because it would mean that all you've learned from getting older is how to hate and how to be ignorant at a socially acceptable level.
|
In hindsight, I think posting to the article was a bad decision, as a lot of people seem to be sticking to that.
I just posted it because it was what got me thinking.
With that said, I won't necessarily agree with you, but I'm pretty sure disagreeing with you won't change your opinion.
I guess where I'm coming from since I work with teens and some of them have been sexually abused or taken advantage of by adults, I think pedophilia is an awful crime.
Now you said you would have no problem doing it with a 16 year old for cash, but what about a 12 year old or a 10 year old? I think 16 is a fairly reasonable age because most people at that time are at least informed enough to start making decisions on their own. Personally, I turn 24 this week, the only time I'm looking at 16 year olds is when they come nagging me for something at work, and even then will hardly speak to them.
Paying for sex, I don't see as a big deal either. Whether people want to admit it or not, everyone exchanges goods for sex. Its the reason guys take girls out on dates, its a bit more dressed up, but we pretty much all have the same goal in mind.